Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum [asc] Replies Views Posted
    Thread: hashcat v4.0.0
Post: RE: hashcat v4.0.0

The rules itself are not "adjusted" - the rule engine itself however is.
atom hashcat 11 86,633 11-20-2017, 08:20 PM
    Thread: What mode is md5(md5($pass).$salt) salt is > 30char and < 30char
Post: RE: What mode is md5(md5($pass).$salt) salt is > ...

I think he's talking about cracking vbull hashes. You can crack them with hashcat v4.0.1 in mode 2611 (not 2711) when not using -O.
atom hashcat 2 3,047 11-20-2017, 08:48 PM
    Thread: Restore Fails
Post: RE: Restore Fails

It is (but not with a .restore file written from v3.6).
atom hashcat 12 8,646 11-20-2017, 08:58 PM
    Thread: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
Post: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself

Keyspace is not the number of words in a wordlist: Quote: -- $ wc -l rockyou.txt  14344391 rockyou.txt $ ./hashcat --keyspace rockyou.txt  14344384 -- So 14344391 != 14344384. It's a...
atom hashcat 15 20,288 11-21-2017, 11:14 AM
    Thread: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
Post: RE: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself

There's another nice example! The hash-mode has also influence: Quote: -- $ ./hashcat --keyspace -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -m 0 100000 $ ./hashcat --keyspace -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -m 400 10000000...
atom hashcat 15 20,288 11-21-2017, 11:20 AM
    Thread: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself
Post: RE: Do not try to write --keyspace yourself

Here's more crazy stuff. The mask itself can have an influence even if the length does not change: Quote: -- $ ./hashcat --keyspace -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d 100000 $ ./hashcat --keyspace -a 3 ?d?dx?...
atom hashcat 15 20,288 11-21-2017, 11:25 AM
    Thread: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
Post: RE: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)

Try -w 4
atom hashcat 7 6,862 11-22-2017, 11:43 AM
    Thread: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)
Post: RE: hashcat 4.0.1 more slow than 3.6 (GT 740M)

The meaning of -w 4 changed massively with 4.x, otherwise i would not have asked
atom hashcat 7 6,862 11-24-2017, 08:13 PM
    Thread: proper use of increment option
Post: RE: proper use of increment option

The "min-max" options are used for the mask, therefore looks good to me (since WPA is also limited to a min of 8).
atom hashcat 6 17,940 11-26-2017, 10:10 AM
    Thread: Hi guys, thanks in advance.
Post: RE: Hi guys, thanks in advance.

For -a 1 you need 2 wordlists
atom hashcat 4 3,606 12-21-2017, 10:46 AM
    Thread: NEED HELP
Post: RE: NEED HELP

Maybe AMD changed something in the API to hardware management with their latest windows drivers? That would explain why you also had to update Afterburner. Anyway I don't have any AMD gpu in combinati...
atom hashcat 8 6,037 01-04-2018, 03:08 PM
    Thread: Legacy hardware won't cut it(HD 5970)
Post: RE: Legacy hardware won't cut it(HD 5970)

That's the typical behaviour with the drivers. They often change the optimization settings in the JiT compiler. Sometimes the driver then optimizes something to the bad, so it becomes slower than if i...
atom hashcat 7 5,444 01-04-2018, 03:14 PM
    Thread: Informative output
Post: RE: Informative output

It's a bit more complicated, because of the parallel computing. The important part here is that it's a unique ID (per session).
atom hashcat 3 3,128 01-10-2018, 01:34 PM
    Thread: Old Office and KDF
Post: RE: Old Office and KDF

You need to use 9720 if you collided with 9710 to get the password. Or you just use 9700. Using collider makes sense only if you want to find as many collisions as possible.
atom hashcat 13 10,132 01-23-2018, 11:34 AM
    Thread: Issue with large hcmask file
Post: RE: Issue with large hcmask file

Can not reproduce locally. Can you retry with a single GPU?
atom hashcat 15 9,382 01-23-2018, 11:36 AM
    Thread: Combinator Attac
Post: RE: Combinator Attac

If you use small wordlists in combinator mode you better use --stdout and pipe the input back to hashcat. That makes sense for slow hashes only (but rar3 is one).
atom hashcat 7 6,044 01-23-2018, 11:36 AM
    Thread: Old Office and KDF
Post: RE: Old Office and KDF

Just use -m 9700 then and crack as normal
atom hashcat 13 10,132 01-24-2018, 11:02 AM
    Thread: Combinator Attac
Post: RE: Combinator Attac

./hashcat -a 1 dict1.txt dict2.txt --stdout | ./hashcat -m 13000 hash.txt
atom hashcat 7 6,044 01-24-2018, 11:03 AM
    Thread: Old Office and KDF
Post: RE: Old Office and KDF

Just use ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a it will crack one pretty soon. This might not be the correct one, but it will be good enough to open the document.
atom hashcat 13 10,132 01-27-2018, 10:12 PM
    Thread: Trying to increase performance of mask attack with a two character prefix
Post: RE: Trying to increase performance of mask attack ...

The strategy to use -m 20 is the right one as -m 20 is around 10-100 times faster than -m 0 if the mask has a static prefix. The reason why this is not in your case is because your prefix is not entir...
atom hashcat 9 6,972 01-28-2018, 07:17 PM