|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking Bill Gates WPA at $90,000/sec
Post: RE: Cracking Bill Gates WPA at $90,000/sec
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
11,168 |
06-24-2015, 11:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: run execl and cudaHashCat-1.36 on Linux
Post: RE: run execl and cudaHashCat-1.36 on Linux
| usually hashcat / oclHashcat expects you to run it from its installation folder. If you can not do that, you can also try to symlink all files / folders that they need on startup. use strace to find o... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
4,287 |
07-27-2015, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: which ubuntu version?
Post: RE: which ubuntu version?
| oclHashcat will supported all AMD driver 14.9, so you can selected the driver you want to use. It is compiled on ubuntu 15.04 so maybe not the worst idea to use it but I don't think that's a must |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
4,497 |
08-02-2015, 03:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Idea for hashcat rules based
Post: RE: Idea for hashcat rules based
| That's exactly the reason, see here for details: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack#why_not_stick_to_regular_expressions |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
6,652 |
10-08-2015, 11:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| In theory yes, but my experience with NV and AMD in the past is that they don't care about bugs. When CUDA was young I've reported a ton of bugs and the same for AMD over the years. It takes alot of e... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-25-2015, 09:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: can you split up a rule file?
Post: RE: can you split up a rule file?
| Resume works for rules, too. Bute note the bigger the rules files, the longer it takes to reach a useable restore point, and dive.rule is huge :) |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
8,911 |
10-25-2015, 09:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| I tried, but 7.0 does not support inline asm for lop3 support |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-26-2015, 01:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| For those who aren't following hashcat twitter, I'm experimenting with bitslice for DES/LM (-m 3000) on oclHashcat v1.38. So far everything is working fine but while working on DEScrypt (-m1500) somet... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-24-2015, 11:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| OK, News:
1) I got it so far that the speeds are ~ the same as the ones from DeepLearningJohnDoe. That is 766 MH/s vs. 967 MH/s (on a 980Ti +250MHz) using CUDA. Note that we do a markov-optimized sea... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-30-2015, 05:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What are your strategies for cracking longer passwords?
Post: RE: What are your strategies for cracking longer p...
| Wordhound and Prince
https://bitbucket.org/mattinfosec/wordhound
https://github.com/jsteube/princeprocessor |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
6,119 |
11-02-2015, 02:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
|
atom Wrote: (10-30-2015, 05:42 PM)
--
#define mysel(a,b,c) (bitselect (a,b,(c) ? 0xffffffff : 0)) -- Getting 251 MH/s
So there's a drop from 470 MH/s to 251 for dynamic salt support. I'll take it ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-02-2015, 03:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| Sounds good to me, 106.9 MH/s * 25 = 2672,5 |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-04-2015, 10:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| OK, so I'm reaching a point where it becomes harder to increase the speed alot. Here's some final values:
290x:
-m 1500: 350 MH/s with dynamic salt, 450 MH/s with fixed salt
-m 3000: 12000MH/s ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-10-2015, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and "--outfile-format=NUM"
Post: RE: oclHashcat and "--outfile-format=NUM"
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
5,131 |
02-05-2016, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: sequential hash? reallly weird!
Post: RE: sequential hash? reallly weird!
| Given the fact that it's exactly 16 asterisks after the F, I'd guess the part between S and F (inclusive) is some fixed salt. Only way to find out is to look at the source (or reverse the binary). |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
3,674 |
04-02-2016, 02:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: edit session settings?
Post: RE: edit session settings?
| You can also restore from the original and see the status screen, in one of the last lines it say restore point. Copy that number and then run your original command again and add -s |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
5 |
5,908 |
07-04-2016, 01:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: add more parimiters to ?u?u?u?u?u?u?u?u
Post: RE: add more parimiters to ?u?u?u?u?u?u?u?u
| Only maskprocessor can do that |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
3,110 |
07-04-2016, 01:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Building a password cracking machine
Post: RE: Building a password cracking machine
|
Crackattack Wrote: (07-08-2016, 11:20 PM)
--
Yea I'm aware sli isn't the best way, I'm asking how many gpu could you put on a setup like brutalis 8 gpu doesn't sound much
--
You can not do 20 GPU... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
9 |
19,700 |
07-09-2016, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Open Document Format
Post: RE: Open Document Format
| There's a request for adding support here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/101 |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
3,780 |
07-17-2016, 05:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Change the apply order of rules?
Post: RE: Change the apply order of rules?
| That's not possible, because of the stdin feature. We can not rewind stdin to restart with rule 2. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
2,746 |
07-17-2016, 06:05 PM |
