|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: amd-gpu-pro update
Post: RE: amd-gpu-pro update
| Did you run sudo amdconfig --initial -f --adapter=all ? |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
35 |
48,976 |
12-26-2016, 12:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Speed difference between brute and dictionary for very slow hashes (7-zip) ?
Post: RE: Speed difference between brute and dictionary ...
| That's only for the 7-Zip algorithm because the password length has a large influence on the cracking speed. Or said a different way, there's no difference between BF and Dictionary if your BF mask is... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
5,256 |
12-29-2016, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Maybe the hashes which you're trying to crack were not created on a server using utf8 but some codepage/iso encoding. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-01-2017, 02:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: amd-gpu-pro update
Post: RE: amd-gpu-pro update
| 16.50 are known to be broken (because of speed), use 16.40. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
35 |
48,976 |
01-01-2017, 07:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: amd-gpu-pro update
Post: RE: amd-gpu-pro update
| I disagree. I'd say 350MH/s -> 720MH/s is a noticeable change. Anyway, we can only try to workaround the mess up created by the latest drivers. We can't change the driver itself. Note that for new Lin... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
35 |
48,976 |
01-02-2017, 10:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Hashcat uses binary loading of the wordlist, there's no functions used that somehow do a textual interpretation of the data (and automatically convert them). Therefore it makes absolute no sense what ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-02-2017, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: amd-gpu-pro update
Post: RE: amd-gpu-pro update
| Try again with latest beta from https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
35 |
48,976 |
01-03-2017, 11:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| I don't know, I find this really hard to understand to what you said in the beginning:
Quote:
--
For some reasons I have to use hashcat on both The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-03-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Itunes Backup
Post: RE: Itunes Backup
| Not a bug, the speed is simply less than 1H/s (that's because they do pbkdf-hmac2-sha256 with 10 million iterations). That means the speed is not 0, but its somewhere between 0 and 1. Hashcat however ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
42 |
83,234 |
01-27-2017, 11:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Parse Database
Post: RE: Parse Database
| The hashcat way to do this is using --show: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_can_i_show_previously_cracked_passwords_and_output_them_in_a_specific_format_eg_emailpas... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
8,950 |
01-27-2017, 11:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: amd-gpu-pro update
Post: RE: amd-gpu-pro update
|
BettyBoop51 Wrote: (02-07-2017, 01:17 AM)
--
But the truth is that the rule-based attack suffers from the same speed performance even with the 16.40 drivers.
16.40, 16.50, and now 16.60... hashca... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
35 |
48,976 |
02-07-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: des raw algorithm
Post: RE: des raw algorithm
| DES cracking is pretty fast with a decent GPU.
Quote:
--
root@et:~/hashcat# ./hashcat -m 14000 hash --hex-charset -1 charsets/DES_full.charset -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
hashcat (v3.30-318-gdd55c1e+) s... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,001 |
02-20-2017, 02:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des raw algorithm
Post: RE: des raw algorithm
| Sure the ETA goes up but not because of the code (so bloom filter is integrated already) it is because the number of salts increase. Your attack, whatever you're doing, is somehow not cleanly designed... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,001 |
02-21-2017, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Process in HashCat $mskrb5$
Post: RE: Process in HashCat $mskrb5$
| You need to move the salt after the hash:
Quote:
--
$krb5pa$23$tester$DOMAIN.COM$salt$601841F258521CD7A97A0032DC61E1050EC45FFFAF14A68851C91C4B925036C1864525DEA643483079D9E3CC6F14D3C1CB6CCC4E
-... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
3,410 |
02-25-2017, 12:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
| Office 2013 Hash *is* that slow. Your CPU issue doesn't have an influence on it. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-18-2017, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-20-2017, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Itunes Backup
Post: RE: Itunes Backup
| It's not a hashcat issue, it's a driver issue. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
42 |
83,234 |
03-22-2017, 01:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| There's no difference, performance-wise |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 02:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think you're confusing what we mean with "performance". That is the number of passwords candidates that are generated in a specific time. It has no relation in how likely such a guess is. That's why... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think royce explained it pretty well. In real life, forensics, pentester and others that do hash cracking as part of their job have no time to attend the process of hash cracking. Even less, they ha... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-28-2017, 10:52 AM |
