Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
I am not sure, but maybe its just the salt length that differs. With a dynamic salt length parser this problem should disappear. If I am wrong please correct me. In this case I can save some work :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-11-2012, 09:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: osx hash and hashcat-lite?
Post: RE: osx hash and hashcat-lite?
This hash does not fit into oclHashcat-lite architecture. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
6,242 |
04-16-2012, 09:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Logging feature
Post: RE: Logging feature
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
10,945 |
04-26-2012, 10:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Logging feature
Post: RE: Logging feature
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
10,945 |
04-26-2012, 03:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: Oracle 10G & Lower - DES($salt.$pass)
its already released, see v0.08 |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
29,773 |
05-03-2012, 10:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
implemented in latest oclHashcat-lite v0.10 beta. please try |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
05-05-2012, 10:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: EPiServer hash format
Post: RE: EPiServer hash format
Sure, I know. I am using the same hash format JtR uses, with the version tag *0* indicating that this is the unmodified algorithm setting (.NET SHA1 hash format).
The new beta version is up on http... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
21 |
69,491 |
05-06-2012, 03:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: EPiServer hash format
Post: RE: EPiServer hash format
I've finished a first version. See here:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# echo testPassword | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 141 hash
** Valid keyfile for beta usage: atom (expires 04.05.2013)... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
21 |
69,491 |
05-06-2012, 12:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-256($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: SHA-256($salt.$pass)
Its all about demand. Someone interessted in this, too? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
26,020 |
05-06-2012, 03:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-256($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: SHA-256($salt.$pass)
SHA-256($salt.$pass) finished
SHA-512($salt.$pass) finished
both on /beta |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
26,020 |
05-08-2012, 03:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,778 |
05-08-2012, 03:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: sha512($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: sha512($salt.$pass)
SHA-512($salt.$pass) finished
see /beta |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
30,355 |
05-08-2012, 03:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: File-based custom charsets
Post: RE: File-based custom charsets
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
12,178 |
05-08-2012, 04:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Add rule name to status
Post: RE: Add rule name to status
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
13,539 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Usability requests
Post: RE: Usability requests
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
11 |
22,850 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Include line number in error message where applicable
Post: RE: Include line number in error message where app...
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,812 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: ocl-lite - load hash from file
Post: RE: ocl-lite - load hash from file
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
10,403 |
05-08-2012, 04:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: maskprocessor --increment
Post: RE: maskprocessor --increment
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
30,798 |
05-08-2012, 04:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: New rule
Post: RE: New rule
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
10,962 |
05-08-2012, 04:08 PM |