Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
11,197 |
07-01-2012, 09:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Yeah, oclHashcat-plus 0.09 requires more RAM because of SHA512. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,485 |
07-03-2012, 09:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
Wait, thats a feature! :)
I dont want to have two parameters where one defines a single-hash and onle defines a hash-file.
I prefer to have that automatically checked. That means oclHashcat checks i... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,682 |
07-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,728 |
07-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
that might be correct for md5 but there are so many other hashes that allow all chars like the base64 ones. so that would require a special parser for each hash type. a lot of work... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,682 |
07-05-2012, 12:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
it would be easier to build hash-type specific memory segments than to load chunks, but that is something with not so high priority yet on my todo list |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,485 |
07-07-2012, 04:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...
Guys, I am working on this :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
8,123 |
07-09-2012, 09:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: RE: Beta 0.09 missing?
Yeah, very big changes and ways to unstable now. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
3,841 |
07-09-2012, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...
OK, I can do that. Thank you. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,682 |
07-09-2012, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: New Beta available
Post: New Beta available
Hey Guys,
added latest beta Versions on the Server:
hashcat (Thanks to Xanadrel!):
desc: added -m 1420: sha256($salt.$pass)
desc: added -m 1410: sha256($pass.$salt)
desc: added -m 1720: sha... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
5,501 |
07-30-2012, 10:46 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
now thats a nice report mastercracker. i need to reproduce some of them while others i know are already known:
Quote:
--
- Status bar at the bottom not always appearing (really intermittent).
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-05-2012, 08:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 02:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
mastercracker Wrote: (08-07-2012, 04:48 AM)
--
For the test-plus.pl, some of the perl modules are a pain to install when you don't know how to do it properly (I learned the hard way what is the easy ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-09-2012, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
mastercracker Wrote: (08-06-2012, 07:42 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (08-06-2012, 02:08 PM)
--
did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested?
--
No. Are we supposed to do that? I ju... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-09-2012, 11:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
There is a new BETA version up, please retry everything. I did several changes. The BUG with the PROMPT still exists, I will fix this later |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-09-2012, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
wonderful report. will work on it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
reproduced:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass)... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 11:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 2 does not work on bruteforce.
- For -m 110 sha1($pass.$salt), Br... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Fixed:
Quote:
--
Prompt is not shown sometimes
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
Left:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the othe... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:25 PM |