Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum [asc] Replies Views Posted
    Thread: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?
Post: RE: AMD 12.6 not recommended updated ?

yeah crossfire always caused problems in the past. if you can, remove the crossfire bridge and try again. its worth trying it
atom Beta Tester 10 11,197 07-01-2012, 09:37 AM
    Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09

Yeah, oclHashcat-plus 0.09 requires more RAM because of SHA512.
atom Beta Tester 6 6,485 07-03-2012, 09:57 AM
    Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...

Wait, thats a feature! :) I dont want to have two parameters where one defines a single-hash and onle defines a hash-file. I prefer to have that automatically checked. That means oclHashcat checks i...
atom Beta Tester 5 5,682 07-04-2012, 10:22 AM
    Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14

added to wiki
atom Beta Tester 11 12,728 07-04-2012, 10:22 AM
    Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...

that might be correct for md5 but there are so many other hashes that allow all chars like the base64 ones. so that would require a special parser for each hash type. a lot of work...
atom Beta Tester 5 5,682 07-05-2012, 12:28 PM
    Thread: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateBuffer() -61 on -plus-0.09

it would be easier to build hash-type specific memory segments than to load chunks, but that is something with not so high priority yet on my todo list
atom Beta Tester 6 6,485 07-07-2012, 04:10 PM
    Thread: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/markov_le.llvmir: no such file...
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite-0.11 error: ./kernels/4098/mar...

Guys, I am working on this :)
atom Beta Tester 9 8,123 07-09-2012, 09:45 AM
    Thread: Beta 0.09 missing?
Post: RE: Beta 0.09 missing?

Yeah, very big changes and ways to unstable now.
atom Beta Tester 3 3,841 07-09-2012, 09:54 AM
    Thread: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exception
Post: RE: Bug: file not found reports as hash length exc...

OK, I can do that. Thank you.
atom Beta Tester 5 5,682 07-09-2012, 09:55 AM
    Thread: New Beta available
Post: New Beta available

Hey Guys, added latest beta Versions on the Server: hashcat (Thanks to Xanadrel!): desc: added -m 1420: sha256($salt.$pass) desc: added -m 1410: sha256($pass.$salt) desc: added -m 1720: sha...
atom Beta Tester 5 5,501 07-30-2012, 10:46 AM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

now thats a nice report mastercracker. i need to reproduce some of them while others i know are already known: Quote: -- - Status bar at the bottom not always appearing (really intermittent). ...
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-05-2012, 08:41 AM
    Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side

did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested?
atom Beta Tester 10 10,283 08-06-2012, 02:08 PM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

mastercracker Wrote: (08-07-2012, 04:48 AM) -- For the test-plus.pl, some of the perl modules are a pain to install when you don't know how to do it properly (I learned the hard way what is the easy ...
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-09-2012, 11:09 AM
    Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side

mastercracker Wrote: (08-06-2012, 07:42 PM) -- atom Wrote: (08-06-2012, 02:08 PM) -- did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested? -- No. Are we supposed to do that? I ju...
atom Beta Tester 10 10,283 08-09-2012, 11:11 AM
    Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side

There is a new BETA version up, please retry everything. I did several changes. The BUG with the PROMPT still exists, I will fix this later
atom Beta Tester 10 10,283 08-09-2012, 11:12 AM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

wonderful report. will work on it
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-10-2012, 11:15 AM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

reproduced: Quote: -- - For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working. - For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes - For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass)...
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-10-2012, 11:37 AM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

Fixed: Quote: -- - For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working. - For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 2 does not work on bruteforce. - For -m 110 sha1($pass.$salt), Br...
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-10-2012, 12:24 PM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

Fixed: Quote: -- Prompt is not shown sometimes --
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-10-2012, 12:24 PM
    Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41

Left: Quote: -- - For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes - For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the othe...
atom Beta Tester 18 16,154 08-10-2012, 12:25 PM