Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 01:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: HD5750 on v45
mastercracker Wrote: (08-14-2012, 06:20 PM)
--
I did not do all algos on v47 as it takes a lot of time but I can confirm that everything works for -m 11 on my HD5750. Was there anything else changed... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 11:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
when you find some time, please redo all tests with v47, i am a bit confused now whats all fixed and whats still left.
at least two things i know that are not working:
- -m 1800 sometimes does not w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
Quote:
--
As a final note, I don't know what the exact problem was with -m 11 and what was the fix but in the real world, there are also Joomla with 16 characters salt. Ideally to crack those we w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-15-2012, 03:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
Thanks mastercracker!
Quote:
--
-m 2711 only dictionary (-a 0) attack works.
-m 2811 only dictionary (-a 0) attack works.
--
This is interessting. The same happens on AMD, so maye there is a shar... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-17-2012, 11:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
Thanks mastercracker!
I have removed the bugs that have been fixed by cat 12.8 in your original post.
Also notice it might be neccessary to compile the kernels again with cat 12.8 but currently this... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-17-2012, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
v48 is up but this is only compiled with catalyst 12.8. there should be no changes to the stated bugs. there is no need to test again before i fixed them. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-17-2012, 11:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
v48 is up but this is only compiled with cuda 5.0. there should be no changes to the stated bugs. there is no need to test again before i fixed them.
cuda 5.0 however produces massive performance inc... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-17-2012, 11:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
I tried to reproduce this one:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
But it was cracked fine. Please verify |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-19-2012, 04:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
New version is up, other bugs still exist. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-20-2012, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 141 Nothing works
--
New version is up, pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-21-2012, 11:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 141 Nothing works
--
New version is up, pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-21-2012, 11:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
how can i reproduce this?
Quote:
--
- The progress and reject counter are wrong, see attached picture.
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-21-2012, 01:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
I am not sure. My testhashes look like this:
echo -n 1306 | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 141 '$episerver$*0*Mzc2NzY1NTU0MTM3NDIxOA==*ITBVvl4lw3w7UGLk/soqInuRkos='
echo -n 56038 ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-21-2012, 08:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
Dynamic salt length should work now (New version uploaded). Here are the requested hashes:
Quote:
--
$episerver$*0*NzYyNDg4MDUxMTEx*IdPKaPmk3qyjeth39wskfa3Uei4=
$episerver$*0*MTAwMzA2NzU2MzA2NA==*A... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-22-2012, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
I tried to fix the bugs with 2711 and 2811 but they are driver related. Next thing is this:
Quote:
--
- Progress and rejected counters wrong.
--
@mastercracker: How can I reproduce? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
Yep, you need 304.x on Linux, not sure which version to use on windows. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-23-2012, 01:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
It depends on what you define a long salt. On -m 1710 supported are salts up to length 16. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 04:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 08:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09b52 speed issues
Hey Blandy,
yeah, I can reproduce it:
v0.08
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/xy/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 1000 /root/testhashes/10 -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed........: 6350... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,159 |
08-24-2012, 02:16 PM |