|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.42 - SSHA-1(Base64) - Bug
Post: RE: hashcat v0.42 - SSHA-1(Base64) - Bug
| Its not a bug, its a missing feature. hashcat CPU does not support dynamic salt length for nsldap, only oclHashcat-* does. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,789 |
01-09-2013, 09:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hashcat crash in XP
Post: RE: New hashcat crash in XP
| Can't reproduce on Linux 64, can't reproduce on Win 32 :( |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,548 |
01-09-2013, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.42: Bugs
Post: RE: 0.42: Bugs
| Maybe related to https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1919.html ?
Can't reproduce |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,654 |
01-09-2013, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b3
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b3
| export DISPLAY=:0
That should solve it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,742 |
01-15-2013, 12:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-16-2013, 06:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bugs
Post: RE: Bugs
| Please post all bugs / ideas etc that could be useful to track on TRAC. Beta or not, it doesnt matter. Maybe will create a beta tracker with time, lets see how it works out. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,654 |
01-17-2013, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: b10 hardcore change
| Starting with b10, I did some hardcore changes to the core about the thread handling, initially caused by TT #9.
If something works strange, do not hesitate - post it! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-24-2013, 06:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| can not reproduce. anyone? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-25-2013, 11:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| guys please check out b13 is fixed some major bugs. i hope the reported issue from craiu is fixed as well. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-25-2013, 10:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| b15 changed even more bugs, i strongly recommend updating. also added sm_35 and password safe and half md5 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-27-2013, 09:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.14b15 - Benchmark results
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite-0.14b15 - Benchmark results
| I cant do anything against this, blame AMD |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,568 |
01-28-2013, 10:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| no it wont work with 12.8 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-28-2013, 06:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-* RC
Post: oclHashcat-* RC
| OK, going to release -lite and -beta somewhere this week.
I put up the first RC version to /beta
Its compiled against old glibc, some people will like that :)
Please test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,620 |
01-28-2013, 06:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.43 rc3
Post: hashcat 0.43 rc3
| hey beta-testers,
for those who havent seen it, hashcat v0.43 is in release candidate. i will release in a few days (or less). please try to do some last minute checks.
--
atom |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,238 |
03-06-2013, 12:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.43 rc3
Post: RE: hashcat 0.43 rc3
| you already found something :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,238 |
03-06-2013, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
| Yeah, thats fine. Its converted from a string to a number. Anyway thanks for reporting |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,769 |
03-21-2013, 02:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new release soon
Post: new release soon
| hey beta-testers,
hashcat v0.44-rc1
oclHashcat-lite v0.15-rc1
oclHashcat-plus v0.14-rc1
are all ready in /beta. the package became much bigger because of the bitness-dependant kernels require... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,439 |
03-21-2013, 02:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new release soon
Post: RE: new release soon
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,439 |
03-22-2013, 01:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| good input.
the first one might be a bug, but i can not reproduce it. can you give me some commandline examples please?
2nd one might be because oclhashcat works a lot different internal with its m... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-31-2013, 12:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
| yes, truecrypt is next target |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-02-2013, 07:52 AM |
