Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
there is beta2 up, try again please |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-28-2013, 12:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
those threading semaphores gave us some headaches. try new beta4 please |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-29-2013, 11:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
b5 is up as well, fixing the same issue for nvidia |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-29-2013, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: v1.00 beta 11 ...
... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.
happy testing!! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,320 |
09-03-2013, 01:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Yes, when you use only 1 hash and brute-force mode :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,320 |
09-03-2013, 02:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...
OK, I will fix this, but the difference is only to see in brute-force as oclHashcat-lite is a brute-force only cracker. So you will only see a difference with single MD5 and NTLM hashes in brute-force... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,320 |
09-06-2013, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...
ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46 will be fixed in b16 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,320 |
09-06-2013, 10:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: Catalyst 13.10b
Post: RE: Catalyst 13.10b
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
3 |
4,121 |
09-10-2013, 09:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
Post: RE: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
lol, try -b --benchmark-mode 1
we may need to lower -n and/or -u for the slow algorithms, too |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,553 |
10-15-2013, 05:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: b41
Post: b41
b41 progress is going good, we're at around -m 3100 of the kernel ports.
also try out the new benchmark mode. simply run oclhashcat64 -b without any other stuff.
recommend driver is 13.9 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,389 |
11-06-2013, 04:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: b41
Post: RE: b41
thanks for the report.
all kernels are ported, b50 is up.
please, whoever can, post the same as KT819GM did. just run in -b mode |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,389 |
11-11-2013, 04:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: beta 59?
Post: RE: beta 59?
yes, it was for hawaii card. btw, 49 not 59 :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,437 |
11-11-2013, 04:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: b53
b53 is up in /beta -- beta tester pls note this version introduced lot of deep memory allocation changes, be very sensible about errors and report soon.
this is especially for windows users |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-14-2013, 03:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Did you make sure to have no words >= length 32 inside your dictionaries? That's the difference between both programs.
There's also a huge difference between b53 and b57, please try again with b57.... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 11:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
I tried to reproduce #1 but failed.
I expect this to be a cr/lf error somehow. Therefore it's important to have a hexdump from a rulefile that creates that error.
Also, did you use b57?
Pleas... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-26-2013, 11:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
No, b57 includes workarounds to all known bugs in catalyst drivers starting from 13.4
You are free to use any driver you want as long as it is >= 13.4 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-26-2013, 10:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Yeah please post commandline. As mastercracker correctly said, it's a new check. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
getops allows the usage of -o between two arguments, but the function that tries to find out if the input hashfile and the outfile is the same seems not to work on windows. please wait for a fix |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
There's a new .exe at https://hashcat.net/beta
Please replace with the existing one and try again.
I can't test since I do not have access to windows system right now.
It's possible that it w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
Excellent, I'm now able to reproduce it.
Will be fixed soon. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,593 |
11-27-2013, 10:10 AM |