Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum [asc] Replies Views Posted
    Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze

there is beta2 up, try again please
atom Beta Tester 14 14,534 08-28-2013, 12:09 PM
    Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze

those threading semaphores gave us some headaches. try new beta4 please
atom Beta Tester 14 14,534 08-29-2013, 11:18 AM
    Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze

b5 is up as well, fixing the same issue for nvidia
atom Beta Tester 14 14,534 08-29-2013, 04:15 PM
    Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: v1.00 beta 11 ...

... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV. happy testing!!
atom Beta Tester 5 6,320 09-03-2013, 01:41 PM
    Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...

Yes, when you use only 1 hash and brute-force mode :)
atom Beta Tester 5 6,320 09-03-2013, 02:48 PM
    Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...

OK, I will fix this, but the difference is only to see in brute-force as oclHashcat-lite is a brute-force only cracker. So you will only see a difference with single MD5 and NTLM hashes in brute-force...
atom Beta Tester 5 6,320 09-06-2013, 10:03 AM
    Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...

ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46 will be fixed in b16
atom Beta Tester 5 6,320 09-06-2013, 10:09 AM
    Thread: Catalyst 13.10b
Post: RE: Catalyst 13.10b

not tried yet, anyone?
atom Beta Tester 3 4,121 09-10-2013, 09:49 AM
    Thread: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
Post: RE: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)

lol, try -b --benchmark-mode 1 we may need to lower -n and/or -u for the slow algorithms, too
atom Beta Tester 4 5,553 10-15-2013, 05:01 PM
    Thread: b41
Post: b41

b41 progress is going good, we're at around -m 3100 of the kernel ports. also try out the new benchmark mode. simply run oclhashcat64 -b without any other stuff. recommend driver is 13.9
atom Beta Tester 4 5,389 11-06-2013, 04:22 PM
    Thread: b41
Post: RE: b41

thanks for the report. all kernels are ported, b50 is up. please, whoever can, post the same as KT819GM did. just run in -b mode
atom Beta Tester 4 5,389 11-11-2013, 04:30 PM
    Thread: beta 59?
Post: RE: beta 59?

yes, it was for hawaii card. btw, 49 not 59 :)
atom Beta Tester 2 3,437 11-11-2013, 04:48 PM
    Thread: b53
Post: b53

b53 is up in /beta -- beta tester pls note this version introduced lot of deep memory allocation changes, be very sensible about errors and report soon. this is especially for windows users
atom Beta Tester 9 10,593 11-14-2013, 03:19 PM
    Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat

Did you make sure to have no words >= length 32 inside your dictionaries? That's the difference between both programs. There's also a huge difference between b53 and b57, please try again with b57....
atom Beta Tester 13 18,414 11-26-2013, 11:48 AM
    Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53

I tried to reproduce #1 but failed. I expect this to be a cr/lf error somehow. Therefore it's important to have a hexdump from a rulefile that creates that error. Also, did you use b57? Pleas...
atom Beta Tester 9 10,593 11-26-2013, 11:53 AM
    Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53

No, b57 includes workarounds to all known bugs in catalyst drivers starting from 13.4 You are free to use any driver you want as long as it is >= 13.4
atom Beta Tester 9 10,593 11-26-2013, 10:01 PM
    Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat

Yeah please post commandline. As mastercracker correctly said, it's a new check.
atom Beta Tester 13 18,414 11-26-2013, 10:03 PM
    Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat

getops allows the usage of -o between two arguments, but the function that tries to find out if the input hashfile and the outfile is the same seems not to work on windows. please wait for a fix
atom Beta Tester 13 18,414 11-26-2013, 10:15 PM
    Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat

There's a new .exe at https://hashcat.net/beta Please replace with the existing one and try again. I can't test since I do not have access to windows system right now. It's possible that it w...
atom Beta Tester 13 18,414 11-26-2013, 10:32 PM
    Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53

Excellent, I'm now able to reproduce it. Will be fixed soon.
atom Beta Tester 9 10,593 11-27-2013, 10:10 AM