|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
Post: RE: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
| i should add two things
a) if a wordlist ends, all the buffers that still have data to process are executed one after another. thats why oclhc+ usually processes cl:1-15 at the end.
b) the size of ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,994 |
02-01-2011, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: [split] OclHashcat+ and --remove
| oclHashcat+ does not support --remove |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-01-2011, 11:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: [split] OclHashcat+ and --remove
| hint: if you have some hashes cracked with oclHashcat+ use the outputfile from oclHashcat+ as a dictionary in hashcat (cpu). there you have --remove |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-01-2011, 11:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| play with it but dont oversize it |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,287 |
02-02-2011, 10:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| what the problem using hashcat to do the --remove work? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-04-2011, 10:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
Post: RE: Quickie on how OclHashcat+ works
| the reason behind that is that some kernels require all plaintexts to be of the same length to process them efficiently. brute-force crackers usually do not have this problem because the length of the... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,994 |
02-01-2011, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| hm, because of the status display it may look like it does not find all passes, but it does. look here:
Quote:
--
root@erebus:~/oclHashcat+-0.02# /root/maskprocessor-0.63/mp64.bin ?d?d?d?d?d?d |... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,287 |
02-03-2011, 12:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| you may need to cut away the hashes. use cut (port also exists for windows) from unix utils package.
cut -b34- < foundpasswords.txt > foundpasswords.txt.cut
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-05-2011, 10:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| true. i will add it to oclhashcat+ in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-09-2011, 10:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
| sometimes passwords gets salted with a trailing null byte. or newline or other crazy things. run it in --output-format=2 mode and verify results |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,372 |
02-11-2011, 05:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
| thats something it will do if it has --remove switch. till then, use hashcat cpu version to do it / see how it behaves |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,543 |
02-13-2011, 08:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| maybe i should limit this to like 800 or so in next release |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,287 |
02-13-2011, 08:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,372 |
02-15-2011, 03:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
| ok, i think i can get v0.26 to double the username size to 16 chars. that should be enough? however it will decrease performance a bit. but what do you mean with newline appended? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,748 |
02-16-2011, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,372 |
02-16-2011, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
| i am not sure if i can make it for oclhc+. maybe in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
13,748 |
02-16-2011, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
Post: RE: Error cuCtxPopCurrent (cudaHashcat+64.exe)
| no, they are there for a reason. for example if i want to play games or watch movies on the same card while i am cracking i need to lower these number to make room for additional calculations by 3rd a... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
23,287 |
02-20-2011, 09:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?
| can you try with md5 instead of dcc? dcc had problems in oclhc, too |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,259 |
02-23-2011, 09:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?
| everything is fine! not a bug. both oclhc and oclhc+ just can not crack hashes with plain of length >= 16 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,259 |
02-25-2011, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NooB question oclhashcat+
Post: RE: NooB question oclhashcat+
| p = 0 means you just have no passes cracked |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
6,309 |
03-02-2011, 11:02 AM |
