Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: bit slice
Post: RE: bit slice
We're looking into that. Thanks! |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,388 |
10-10-2015, 08:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: Oracle T: type?
Post: RE: Oracle T: type?
T: Type as added like 1 day after their release
https://twitter.com/hashcat/status/605680220251795456 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,541 |
11-02-2015, 03:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Which setup would be a better choice?
Post: RE: Which setup would be a better choice?
Both cards are fine. Lookup performance reports here on forum and decide by numbers. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
1 |
3,499 |
11-10-2015, 09:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cracking eight different TrueCrypt ciphers for the price of three
Post: Cracking eight different TrueCrypt ciphers for the...
Yeah, that subject really sounds like some bad advertisement, but it actually describes my discovery pretty good, I promise! I don't know if this really is new, however for me it is and it will defini... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
18,094 |
11-13-2015, 05:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat v2.00
Post: hashcat v2.00
[hr]
Download here: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
[hr]
There is a nice new feature added to hashcat version 2.0.
Besides the usual addition of new algorithms, new features and bug fixes this ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
1 |
19,445 |
12-04-2015, 06:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Finding salt with password and hash?
Post: RE: Finding salt with password and hash?
That's the wrong way. Usually you find out about an unknown algorithm by RE the binary which calculates it. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,436 |
01-06-2016, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: VLIW on NVidia Cuda
Post: RE: VLIW on NVidia Cuda
VLIW code for NVidia is only required for cheap sm_21 models. Basically Ti series cards < 9xx series, like the 560Ti. It is required to get out maximum performance for those cards. With newer cards yo... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,382 |
01-12-2016, 08:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: 38 symbols password limit
Post: RE: 38 symbols password limit
Long salts create problems that can not solved generic. such a case requires a dedicated hash mode |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,994 |
02-05-2016, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Any way to do this type of hash type?
Post: RE: Any way to do this type of hash type?
This needs a new hash mode. You can write your own if your C is good enough. Start with -m 4500 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,599 |
02-05-2016, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashtopus Docker
Post: RE: Hashtopus Docker
Nice contribution, thanks! |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
1 |
6,037 |
02-05-2016, 09:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: Why max 128
Post: RE: Why max 128
It's better to have a maximum no one can reach than saying there's no limit. You can increase that number yourself when compiling from source |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,360 |
02-05-2016, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: .pae zip file
Post: RE: .pae zip file
.zip is not supported atm |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
3,986 |
02-07-2016, 10:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: Crack Salt
Post: RE: Crack Salt
It's possible for hmac-sha256, but only up to length 55 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,570 |
02-15-2016, 11:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Alg for Xenforo
Post: RE: Alg for Xenforo
It does not exist, but similar exist (md5(md5(password) . salt) in -m 2611. You can rewrite the kernel to sha256, sha256 code is also present in -m 1400 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,133 |
02-15-2016, 11:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dictionary Attack Question
Post: RE: Dictionary Attack Question
You maybe already cracked it, remove old potfile. If the problem persists, try again with latest beta version. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,763 |
02-28-2016, 02:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: sequential hash? reallly weird!
Post: RE: sequential hash? reallly weird!
Given the fact that it's exactly 16 asterisks after the F, I'd guess the part between S and F (inclusive) is some fixed salt. Only way to find out is to look at the source (or reverse the binary). |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
3,674 |
04-02-2016, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Not sure how to crack a chained SHA-256 hash
Post: RE: Not sure how to crack a chained SHA-256 hash
there's no way to do that with the existing kernels, but since we went OSS you can hack one of them to do what you like. I'd recommend kernel source of -m 1400 as a template |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,300 |
04-18-2016, 05:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Problem with the "add wordlist" button
Post: RE: Problem with the "add wordlist" button
GUI not supported here, please ask on authors site |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,280 |
04-27-2016, 12:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: Do I need to do pipes for my GPU cracking?
Post: RE: Do I need to do pipes for my GPU cracking?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,714 |
05-01-2016, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: GPU #2 shuts down. Temperature control?
Post: RE: GPU #2 shuts down. Temperature control?
No, but maybe not enough workload. You should get a warning like this:
Quote:
--
ATTENTION!
The wordlist or mask you are using is too small.
Therefore, hashcat is unable to utilize the ful... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,133 |
05-13-2016, 03:34 PM |