|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
Post: RE: hashcat 0.41b1 duplicates remove
| Yeah, you're right. hashcat will not sort (and unique) your hashes. It must be done by user. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,088 |
08-26-2012, 08:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Wrong WPA password ?
Post: RE: Wrong WPA password ?
| That is pretty easy. You forgot to run wpaclean before you used it with aircrack-ng. wpaclean is a tool which is part of aircrack-ng. I did it with your testfile and then it worked. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,119 |
08-31-2012, 10:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: len.exe returns empty wordlist
Post: RE: len.exe returns empty wordlist
| Can you post your commandline?
Also, there is no need to trim wordlists for usage with WPA, oclHashcat-plus automatically "rejects" them. Thats the counter you see in the status display. |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
2 |
9,881 |
08-31-2012, 03:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| continue here pls:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1523.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,858 |
09-01-2012, 03:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
Post: RE: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
| james, pls retry and continue here pls :
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1523.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,285 |
09-01-2012, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA-512($pass.$salt)
Post: RE: SHA-512($pass.$salt)
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
28,397 |
09-07-2012, 05:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: sha1($salt.$pass) algorithm
Post: RE: sha1($salt.$pass) algorithm
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
13,124 |
09-07-2012, 05:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: support for sha1($salt.$pass)
Post: RE: support for sha1($salt.$pass)
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,927 |
09-07-2012, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: sha1(username.password) hash support
Post: RE: sha1(username.password) hash support
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,380 |
09-07-2012, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: sha1(salt.pass)
Post: RE: sha1(salt.pass)
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
10,978 |
09-07-2012, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: md5($pass:$salt) support in PLUS version
Post: RE: md5($pass:$salt) support in PLUS version
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
12,277 |
09-07-2012, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Blowfish(UNIX)
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Blowfish(UNIX)
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
10,998 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenBSD Blowfish
Post: RE: OpenBSD Blowfish
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,479 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [OclHashcat+] sha512(UNIX)
Post: RE: [OclHashcat+] sha512(UNIX)
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,112 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: rules and masks
Post: RE: rules and masks
| You can use multi rules feature and use maskprocessor to generate rules (see wiki) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,306 |
09-15-2012, 10:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?
Post: RE: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?
| use A for 10, B for 11, etc |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,644 |
09-16-2012, 11:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: There's a tick on the pluscat!!![bug report on v0.10b2]
Post: RE: There's a tick on the pluscat!!
