|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[desc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.00 Build Program Failure
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.00 Build Program Failure
| I have an idea, but I can not reproduce it locally. Please come to IRC and query me so that I can send you a special patched version. If we find out it's working I'll submit it to GitHub as well. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,710 |
07-11-2016, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: No keyspace for the distributed hashcat v3.00
Post: RE: No keyspace for the distributed hashcat v3.00
| Please use --keyspace. You will find out that the use of --keyspace is not allowed in combination with -i, which is required to tell hashcat to increase the mask-length with each iteration by one. So ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,011 |
07-12-2016, 01:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Segmentation fault on Mesa and AMDGPU
Post: RE: Segmentation fault on Mesa and AMDGPU
| Yes, hashcat fully supports them. But they are very unstable and therefore they often crash.
To verify it's not hashcat, compile hashcat from sources with DEBUG=1 make and then run the same command... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,179 |
07-15-2016, 10:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is this error 2xRX480 related?
Post: RE: Is this error 2xRX480 related?
| No, this is a known bug in AMD OpenCL runtime/compiler, which is part of the AMD driver. Somewhere between AMD driver version 15.12 and the current driver they made some change and this change was bad... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,313 |
07-15-2016, 10:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is this error 2xRX480 related?
Post: RE: Is this error 2xRX480 related?
| If this is a workaround for you, just clone it from github, remove the quotes, recompile. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,313 |
07-15-2016, 06:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Segmentation fault on Mesa and AMDGPU
Post: RE: Segmentation fault on Mesa and AMDGPU
| Yes, that's true. You have either switch to windows, buy a new gpu with amdgpu-pro support or stick to an older distribution. Thanks AMD :) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,179 |
07-15-2016, 06:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: mask password without 3 or more recurring characters
Post: RE: mask password without 3 or more recurring char...
| maskprocessor can do that for "aaa", but not for different cases like "EeE". |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
5,149 |
07-17-2016, 06:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Incomplete hash -how to find out the password??
Post: RE: Incomplete hash -how to find out the password?...
| please post some examples |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,303 |
07-17-2016, 06:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: mask password without 3 or more recurring characters
Post: RE: mask password without 3 or more recurring char...
| No, can't work from within hashcat |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
5,149 |
07-18-2016, 12:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Incomplete hash -how to find out the password??
Post: RE: Incomplete hash -how to find out the password?...
| There's no such option in hashcat to do that, but you can patch the kernel if you have some programming skills. There's a mode that does this partially, mode 5100, you can use it to get an idea of how... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,303 |
07-18-2016, 12:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: inc_vendor.cl errors
Post: RE: inc_vendor.cl errors
| See here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5653-post-30374.html#pid30374 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,657 |
07-19-2016, 08:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Old format available?
Post: RE: Old format available?
| There's no algorithm that you can use out of the box to do that. You need to patch a kernel. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,975 |
07-19-2016, 09:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: inc_vendor.cl errors
Post: RE: inc_vendor.cl errors
| Either that, and I'm not certain if 15.12 supports the 380x, or you patch it out manually |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,657 |
07-20-2016, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: legacy hashcat question
Post: RE: legacy hashcat question
| There's no true generic kernel. There's always a limit. In theory, you could have a 25gb long bytestream as salt. That would propably exceed your GPU ram. But even such a thing could be supported, but... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,589 |
07-20-2016, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
Post: RE: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
| Try without --username, it takes alot of extra memory. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,674 |
07-20-2016, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
Post: RE: Insufficient memory, md5 combo
| Sure, you need to remove the username first. Use "cut" to do that. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,674 |
07-21-2016, 09:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
Post: RE: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
| You can't do -a 1 with -r in combination. What I meant is more like this:
$ ./combinator.bin words.dict words.dict | ./hashcat -m 0 -a 0 -r rules.rule
This way you can't specify which rule to ap... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,682 |
07-22-2016, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
Post: RE: Combinator Attack with Stacked Rules
| You just need to create a handful of rules that insert the 1 into all positions starting from 0 to 10 or so. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,682 |
07-24-2016, 03:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Debug Mode
Post: RE: Debug Mode
| You mean which mask matches a password? That's like impossible to answer, because there's too many. Do you want to know which rule cracked a password? Use debug mode. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,652 |
07-27-2016, 11:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Debug Mode
Post: RE: Debug Mode
| Hashcat uses markov-chain optimizations. IOW, there's no Aaaaa9999 (or better said Zzzzz9999) as final word. If you just want the mask which was used to crack your hash, why don't you name the output ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,652 |
08-12-2016, 02:46 PM |
