|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
|
Quote:
--
However, we might just get a ruleset highly specific to the wordlist used.
--
That's some nice idea I did not thought on before. Problem I see with this that everyone has it's own "p... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-25-2015, 10:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| My hope about the contest is that we find the most generally used rules that we can use in cracking slow hashes. |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-25-2015, 10:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
|
Repentance Wrote: (04-25-2015, 07:28 PM)
--
I call Best32, Best64 and Best128
--
That's one possibility. We can also make a Best128 and sort by efficiency, so one can head -XXX the file and take th... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-27-2015, 01:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
| I thought again about the contest from the idea of it. The way we think atm, the approach we are using atm, it has also a major disadvantage. If we agree too what our goal is with this contest, to fin... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
34 |
64,152 |
04-27-2015, 01:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| Please post the output of clinfo |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 07:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
Post: RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very goo...
| See there is something wrong with your driver version. You should be on:
Driver version: 1084.4 (VM)
You sure you are not ob 13.2 beta? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
54,727 |
02-06-2013, 08:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Thanks guys. I'm not sure if it's taped, question for epixoip :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 03:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| The speeds on RipeMD160 will improve again once AMD fixes this confirmed bug:
https://devgurus.amd.com/thread/166396
Currently I have to workaround this which makes the code a little bit slower. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| No, I'm working on > length 15 support. If I'm done with that, I will release. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 05:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Thanks for the benchmarks!
As I said, there was potential to improve the Whirlpool hash. I've just finished implementing it.
On my 2x hd6990 speed increased from 31 kHash/s to 49 kHash/s.
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-18-2013, 03:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Hey Guys,
I've some good news! I've justed finished a working oclHashcat-plus version to support cracking TrueCrypt :)
Everything is written 100% on GPU.
There is no copy overhead to the host, thu... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 02:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| well, in theory - yes. in practice - no :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
06-11-2013, 05:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| The relase date is not yet known. But shouldn't be to far. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
08-06-2013, 01:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
| Yes, you just need to copy the first 512 byte. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
08-29-2013, 09:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha256 ($pass), $data)
Post: RE: Anyone interested in being paid to add support...
| Please create the github issue and follow the descriptions in the link from the wiki. Is this something useful for other people too? How many people use this wallet? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
32 |
25,733 |
06-27-2017, 11:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha256 ($pass), $data)
Post: RE: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha25...
| Electrum support (salt-type 1) has been added to hashcat. You can use the beta https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
32 |
25,733 |
01-29-2018, 02:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha256 ($pass), $data)
Post: RE: Electrum support - aes_decrypt (sha256 (sha25...
|
atom |
hashcat
|
32 |
25,733 |
01-30-2018, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| LM will be added next version! :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-01-2012, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| ofc mastercracker.. oclHashcat-lite is like a formula 1 racing car. its good for experience and then backport stuff to oclHashcat-plus |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-04-2012, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
Mem5 Wrote: (02-05-2012, 09:11 PM)
--
atom do you plan an update for LM for hashcat (cpu) ?
--
no, use RT on CPU |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-06-2012, 10:53 AM |
