|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
| this crash thing is already fixed in 0.08. however, maskprocessor can be used for a lot more things than just a bf emulation generator. for example i like to use it for rule generation:
mp64 '$?d$?d'... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,902 |
02-15-2012, 10:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: Maskprocessor with cudaHashcat-plus on windows
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,902 |
02-15-2012, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat-plus64.bin 0.07
Post: RE: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat...
| Exactly. Thats why both, the homepage and the readme, says:
"NV users require ForceWare 275.33 on Windows or 275.43 on Linux"
It was also send out via Twitter.
Additionally I should mention that wi... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
17,948 |
02-27-2012, 11:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat-plus64.bin 0.07
Post: RE: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat...
| You are right, this is a bug. Just not inside oclhashcat. So there is no way to fix it. Cryptohaze Multiforcer does not support dictionary so you cant compare. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
17,948 |
02-27-2012, 09:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat-plus64.bin 0.07
Post: RE: Inconsistent results for NTLM with cudaHashcat...
| Fixed with oclHashcat-plus v0.071 *HOTFIX* |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
17,948 |
03-12-2012, 07:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
| You are lucky. It's already done in beta :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,778 |
03-18-2012, 04:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
|
Rolf Wrote: (03-18-2012, 05:04 PM)
--
Sha-2 is very gpgpu unfriendly, on a single GTX 480, pluscat does ~71M p/s for a single sha-512 hash.
--
Just in case someone asks himself why it is GPU unfrie... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,778 |
03-18-2012, 07:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: *hashcat benchmarking standard (wiki)
Post: RE: *hashcat benchmarking standard (wiki)
| Maybe a job for arex.
He already started with exactly what you were asking for on here: https://thepasswordproject.com/oclhashcat_benchmarking
More suggestions? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
29,529 |
03-22-2012, 07:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
Post: RE: SHA-512 in cudahashcat
| beta slots are full. please be patient. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
18,778 |
03-28-2012, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| works for me:
Code:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 132 /root/hashcat-0.40/examples/A0.M1300.hash /root/hashcat-0.40/examples/A0.M1300.word
oclHashcat-plus v0.08 by ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,724 |
03-28-2012, 08:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| oh, the -m 131 works too, but you have to reformat the hashes a bit:
Code:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# cat hash
0x0100e16bed510000000000000000000000000000000000000000a72befac3e58eb24d559d9fe... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,724 |
03-28-2012, 08:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| you have to reformat the hashes, see my example above |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,724 |
03-29-2012, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failure (even with A0.M1300.* examples)?
Post: RE: 0.07(1?) MSSQL 2000/5 dictionary attack failur...
| I think so, yes. In my example above you can see I cracked all 10 of 10 hashes with the 10 words from the dictionary. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,724 |
03-29-2012, 04:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Yet another hash identification problem
Post: RE: Yet another hash identification problem
| osx hashes are salted, but maybe the exporter forget to export the salt |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
16,804 |
04-04-2012, 09:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: BruteForce with custom chart set
Post: RE: BruteForce with custom chart set
| charset files will be supported with 0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,033 |
04-09-2012, 01:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: BruteForce with custom chart set
Post: RE: BruteForce with custom chart set
| Sorry, I cant give any estimates for this. Markov isnt hard to code, I just dont think its that important. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,033 |
04-09-2012, 06:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| All right, will do that for oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-10-2012, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| I am not sure, but maybe its just the salt length that differs. With a dynamic salt length parser this problem should disappear. If I am wrong please correct me. In this case I can save some work :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-11-2012, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: where to download autocrack.pl script?
Post: RE: where to download autocrack.pl script?
| Its already working. If you need it PM me on IRC. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
14,588 |
04-12-2012, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which drivers for a ATI 5830?
Post: RE: Which drivers for a ATI 5830?
| Then you have a to old driver installed, because its part of the current ones. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
7 |
13,616 |
04-12-2012, 05:57 PM |
