|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
fatalx Wrote: (02-08-2012, 02:11 AM)
--
What card are you using that it will only take 200 minutes?
I'm running a 5670 and it says 23 hours, and the speed is 88400k/s.
NTLM runs at 2200M/s. Is this... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-08-2012, 11:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| This version is the result of over 6 months of work, having modified 618,473 total lines of source code.
Before we go into the details of the changes, here's a quick summary of the major changes:
Add... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
31 |
215,942 |
08-24-2013, 08:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
|
Kuci Wrote: (08-31-2013, 06:57 PM)
--
@atom: What is up with HMAC-SHA256 ? I thought it will be implemented in this release, but I can not see it even in beta version. On Trac I see it is already ac... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
31 |
215,942 |
09-02-2013, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
Post: RE: oclHashcat benchmark with Apple CPU + GPU
| please do:
./oclhashcat.app --benchmark --opencl-device-type 2 --opencl-vector-width 2 -m 900
./oclhashcat.app --benchmark --opencl-device-type 2 --opencl-vector-width 2 -m 0
and see if it does any ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
31 |
51,171 |
02-20-2016, 02:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
| That's an interessting question. Thing is, we dropped native permutation attack from oclHashcat a while back. But even then it was not really an option becuase there was no way to add a separator char... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-05-2015, 09:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
| Well if you stick to mask-attack the maximum is 55, so I really think you want to do that |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-05-2015, 11:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
| Sure it's the insert rule. Rules are described here in detail:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack
The first parameter is the offset, the 2nd the actual char to insert. In our... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-07-2015, 11:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
|
Quote:
--
insert character 'K' at postition 1?
--
Nope, the opposite, insert character '1' at position 'K' :)
Quote:
--
For positions over 9, use A-Z, for a total of 36 possible positions
--
... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-07-2015, 05:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Maximum length of 31? Why?
| If you use -a 3 (mask-attack) it will work because the limit with mask attack is 55.
Quote:
--
root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.36# ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 100 hash '8|7|9|4|2|10|6|11|12|1|0|5|13|3|14' -a 3... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-05-2015, 11:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
| OK, here's the solution:
##
## generate base
##
Quote:
--
$ cat perm-input.txt
0123456789
--
Quote:
--
$ /root/hashcat-utils-1.2/permute.bin < perm-input.txt | more
0123456789
1023456789
2013... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-06-2015, 03:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Formatted/mask permutations?
| Well yeah from what you need to know about GPU's that you need an amplfier for fast hashes:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#does_the_pci-express_speed_have_any_infl... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-07-2015, 02:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
|
epixoip Wrote: (06-17-2015, 12:45 AM)
--
No, the specs confirm that it IS 2x 7970 on a single chip.
7970: GCN, 2048 stream processors, 32 compute units, 4.3 billion transistors
Fury X: GCN, 4096 str... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,737 |
06-17-2015, 04:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fury X has joined the game
Post: RE: Fury X has joined the game
|
Flomac Wrote: (06-18-2015, 12:19 PM)
--
Btw. the latest AMD drivers are these Omega 14.12, which are not working under hashcat.
Did this change with the latest beta drivers? Otherwise it might be a ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
30 |
57,737 |
06-18-2015, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
Post: RE: Share your vclHashcat-lite speeds
| You guys are crazy :) Nice numbers, gratz! |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
55,584 |
01-10-2013, 02:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Oh and btw, hashcat is not a fork of JtR. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,492 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| I usually do not like to talk about why is hashcat not open source, because people are very stubborn when it comes to this question. There are 1000 arguments for and against open source (or closed sou... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,492 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any version later than v4.2.1 !!
Post: RE: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any ...
| There are constant code changes with the goal to have the software more robust and performing better, that's all. One of the changes is misinterpreted by the AMD OpenCL runtime, but that's a problem i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
29 |
21,222 |
01-31-2019, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any version later than v4.2.1 !!
Post: RE: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any ...
| There's not much to say in terms of error message. This error occurs if the self-test hash was not cracked but it should be cracked. That's all we know. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
29 |
21,222 |
02-13-2019, 05:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance
Post: RE: Performance
| Also note that -m 2611 is an iterated algorithm, not raw md5. Speed is at least twice as slow, maybe more. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
28 |
50,467 |
01-27-2013, 09:45 AM |
