Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat outdated
Post: RE: Hashcat outdated
hashcat-gui-0.5.0 has been released and fixed that |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
15,194 |
01-16-2012, 02:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Lost
Post: RE: Lost
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,628 |
01-16-2012, 02:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
Post: RE: Don't work Sha-1(base-64)
You have to convert it to HEX, not to binary. For example, go to this site: https://x00.co/~tools/ and choose "Base64 decode to hex". With your hash, it will result an 64 byte string, which is usually ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
12,367 |
01-19-2012, 07:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
Post: RE: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
dunno. can you post an example hash + salt + plaintext pls? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,645 |
01-19-2012, 06:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
Post: RE: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
you are lucky. both hashcat cpu and hashcat-plus as well support this algorithm. the new -lite also support it in beta, which is not yet released. in plus, its the algorithm type 2811.
Quote:
--
ro... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,645 |
01-19-2012, 10:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
Post: RE: Just want to confirm it doesn't support
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
13,645 |
01-20-2012, 01:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
Post: RE: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
hello, this is about hex encoding the salt, see here:
with ansi (hashcat default)
Quote:
--
root@thumbstone:~# echo -n 506813180000000000000000 | sha1sum
d9d4ec51debfaba4e603003e594705b81a22e2ca ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
27,124 |
01-27-2012, 06:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
Post: RE: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
Code:
--
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Digest::SHA qw (sha1_hex);
my $max = 99999999;
my $target = $ARGV[0] or die ("usage: $0 hash\n");
for (my $i = 0; $i < $max;... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
27,124 |
01-27-2012, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: output file
Post: RE: output file
oclhashcat-plus exactly gets the --show and --username feature to solve this |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
18,243 |
01-31-2012, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: error with V0.09 for SL3
Post: RE: error with V0.09 for SL3
This is error message from catalyst 11.12. Your catalyst 12.1 installation might be not successfull. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
12,456 |
02-05-2012, 02:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: error with V0.09 for SL3
Post: RE: error with V0.09 for SL3
uninstall SDK, uninstall driver, driver sweep all amd ati gpu stuff which is left, install cat 12.1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
12,456 |
02-08-2012, 11:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
Post: RE: bruteforce sha1 with hashcat
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
27,124 |
02-08-2012, 04:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
Post: RE: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
You are using an outdated debug-mode. Try again with --stdout |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
10,458 |
02-13-2012, 10:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
Post: RE: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
OK, I can reproduce it. Thanks for reporting! |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
10,458 |
02-13-2012, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
Post: RE: hashcat 0.39, Bug found with 'p' rule
OK, new beta 0.39b22 is up in /beta. Please try again. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
10,458 |
02-13-2012, 01:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07 - WPA key not found
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
please add all required info into a screenshot for a prev check |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,333 |
02-17-2012, 10:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: what is the 381.5k(M) c/s mean?
Post: RE: what is the 381.5k(M) c/s mean?
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,036 |
02-17-2012, 10:30 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07 - WPA key not found
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
There is an rejected word. Maybe that is the correct pass? This is if it is longer than 15 chars - which is not supported. Otherwise paste the dictionary, tell me the correct plaintext and send me bot... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,333 |
02-17-2012, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07 - WPA key not found
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,333 |
02-17-2012, 06:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need help with script.
Post: RE: Need help with script.
try using screen, it needs a tty otherwise it runs into a cpu burning loop. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
10,931 |
02-21-2012, 08:46 PM |