Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Some feature
Post: RE: Some feature
Hmm sounds interessting. I think we can do that on CPU. GPU would not make much sense, as malik and mastercracker already said. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,850 |
08-19-2012, 10:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: piping hashcat into pyrit
Post: RE: piping hashcat into pyrit
Its still questionable why you use pyrit at all. Its old, not maintained and slower than oclHashcat-plus. Its even slower when running with GPU + CPU at once while oclHashcat-plus only uses GPU. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
13,264 |
08-31-2012, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: sha512 (unix) in oclhashcat-plus
Post: RE: sha512 (unix) in oclhashcat-plus
Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
23,744 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Lost
Post: RE: Lost
Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,628 |
09-07-2012, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 special version
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 special version
This special version is no longer supported. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
6 |
22,314 |
09-09-2012, 02:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
What is the exact filename of the kernel it loads? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,578 |
09-20-2012, 08:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
923.1 is an very old catalyst, it should be 938.2. They are known not to work. You need 12.8 its the reason.
You may need driversweeper |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,578 |
09-21-2012, 09:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,578 |
09-22-2012, 11:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: What kind of hash is this?
Post: RE: What kind of hash is this?
The char = on the end mostly points to Base64 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
12,600 |
10-12-2012, 10:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No hashes loaded
Post: RE: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No ha...
paste 1 example hash but only first 4 chars |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,856 |
10-15-2012, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No hashes loaded
Post: RE: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No ha...
Hashcat limits phpass to $P$B |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,856 |
10-15-2012, 10:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No hashes loaded
Post: RE: hash:[x], invalid iteration count ERROR: No ha...
defaults will work, its only those which are customized will not |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,856 |
10-15-2012, 11:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU Usage
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite 0.09 linux x64 hd5970 50% GPU ...
You used Catalyst 12.4 or 12.9 beta? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
12,067 |
10-17-2012, 01:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Vbulletin v4 salted hash command
Post: RE: Vbulletin v4 salted hash command
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
13,134 |
10-21-2012, 05:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: GPU memory considerations
Post: RE: GPU memory considerations
It doesnt matter because the OpenCL runtime limits a single GPU memory block to 512mb. In other words you will get out-of-memory Problems regardless of GPU memory size. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
17,561 |
10-26-2012, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: GPU memory considerations
Post: RE: GPU memory considerations
Well I should say this is for AMD OpenCL runtime only. But the reasons behind? Only AMD can know :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
17,561 |
10-26-2012, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: GPU memory considerations
Post: RE: GPU memory considerations
Yes, but it wont help since we need to copy the hashlists to each device on its own to have fast access. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
17,561 |
10-27-2012, 08:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Can't reproduce (tested with hd5770 + hd7970):
oclHashcat-plus:
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (1st run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (2nd run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Dig... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
I was able to reproduce the bug after talking to blandy on IRC. b36 is up and should fix it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 03:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
OK, thanks for reporting again! Both issues should be fixed with b38 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-31-2012, 12:15 PM |