|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00
| Thanks for the screenshots. As philsmd already pointed out, that's the ideal handling. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,322 |
06-26-2016, 10:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat FPGA support
Post: RE: oclHashcat FPGA support
| 1. I think the FPGA is much slower than GPU, especially after NVidias maxwell chipset and the 16nm shrink with the 10xx series. You should be able to do a compairson on the following number: 1 raw md5... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
16,559 |
06-27-2016, 01:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Post: RE: dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
| Your CPU is so slow because you are using the AMD driver. For optimal CPU performance with Intel CPUs you need the Intel OpenCL SDK. Capeverde is your GPU. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,613 |
07-06-2016, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Post: RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
| Please stick to 7bit characters for the pathname, it will save you a lot of headache. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,613 |
07-06-2016, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: FPGA is that any good?
Post: RE: FPGA is that any good?
| We don't have enough experience with it. Support for all OpenCL devices types just started with hashcat v3.00. Also we don't have any hardware to test on. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
10,259 |
07-08-2016, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Using hashcat on my CentOS 6 machine
Post: RE: Using hashcat on my CentOS 6 machine
| You need to install both, the OpenCL ICD and the Intel OpenCL SDK. The OpenCL ICD is an OSS project maintained from khronos itself, you can find it on github, and so there should be a package for it. ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
10,607 |
07-11-2016, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Build cluster 8X8 Geforce
Post: RE: Build cluster 8X8 Geforce
| See this thread: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3047.html |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
6 |
7,966 |
07-14-2016, 12:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: device local mem size is too small, use anyway?
Post: RE: device local mem size is too small, use anyway...
| Some of the algorithms wont work, they will fail to compile, that way you know if it's safe to use that session or not. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
28,662 |
07-17-2016, 05:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: device local mem size is too small, use anyway?
Post: RE: device local mem size is too small, use anyway...
| Just because 2.01 didn't error it doesn't mean that there was no error. It simply didn't support mesa driver and it didn't do such deep checks.
The problem with your CPU is that the latest Intel Ope... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
28,662 |
07-19-2016, 08:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: device local mem size is too small, use anyway?
Post: RE: device local mem size is too small, use anyway...
| The problem with your CPU is that the latest Intel OpenCL runtime is not compatible with it. See this thread for a solution: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5627.html |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
28,662 |
07-24-2016, 03:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcah 3.0 dev keepass
Post: RE: hashcah 3.0 dev keepass
| Wordlist is too small, hashcat can't distribute the workload |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,380 |
08-12-2016, 03:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Tool idea for splitting workload WPA/WPA2 (with friends or ppl who want to help)
Post: RE: Tool idea for splitting workload WPA/WPA2 (wit...
| Why don't you use the integrated distrubtion solution with -s and -l and --keyspace? See here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3047.html |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
6 |
8,896 |
08-15-2016, 11:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
Post: RE: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
|
Quote:
--
FWIW we've had this optimization is JtR for a year or so, albeit only in our CPU code yet (not sure why). It was brought up back then by Aleksey Cherepanov in https://www.openwall.com/list... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
9,537 |
08-21-2016, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
Post: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
| Just wanted to note here about the following commit on GitHub:
https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/ebc1f83c93f680dd8d3f46e418ea9c8a51d95501
This implement a meet-in-the-middle optimization... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
9,537 |
08-20-2016, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't detect temp
Post: RE: Can't detect temp
| Is NVML not part of the nvidias mobile drivers? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,431 |
09-12-2016, 08:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't detect temp
Post: RE: Can't detect temp
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,431 |
09-13-2016, 09:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: macOS - mask attack doesn't work
Post: RE: macOS - mask attack doesn't work
| It's an opencl runtime problem. If possible try to update the driver. Anyway, not hashcats fault here. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,495 |
10-10-2016, 05:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error in Hashcat 3.10
Post: RE: Error in Hashcat 3.10
| I got a report for this from someone else, too. Please try again with latest beta version from hashcat.net/beta/
If it does not help, please give me exact and all details I need to reproduce this. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,141 |
10-26-2016, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error in Hashcat 3.10
Post: RE: Error in Hashcat 3.10
| I've re-added the mask length. You can test with latest hashcat beta |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,141 |
10-30-2016, 03:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error in Hashcat 3.10
Post: RE: Error in Hashcat 3.10
| That other error "Restore value greater keyspace" should be fixed with beta 613+ as well |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
7,141 |
11-01-2016, 12:27 AM |
