|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Markov and Statsprocessor on the wiki
Post: RE: Markov and Statsprocessor on the wiki
| Just one info (preview), the next version of statsprocessor will not make use of -t any longer since it will use a radical new concept which I think is much better. |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
5 |
12,659 |
02-06-2013, 07:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Restore File Questions
Post: RE: Restore File Questions
| It stores which hash was already cracked (per position). Thats why you can not modify the hashlist afterwards or the restore will not work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
25,160 |
02-22-2013, 03:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
| hashcat does not support -m 112, you need to use oclHashcat-plus |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
15,577 |
03-21-2013, 04:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop)
Post: RE: how to cracking with mobility vga card (laptop...
| Turks GPU is supported, but SL3 no longer |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
9,782 |
03-21-2013, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
Post: RE: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
| if you can post here some step-by-step example from passcode to final hash i can see that i add it to hashcat |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
21,753 |
03-24-2013, 08:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
Post: RE: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
| See this thread as a good example: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2011.html |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
21,753 |
03-24-2013, 08:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
Post: RE: Cracking Android Pattern Hash
| That was easy :)
Hashcat already supports this, check out this example:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat-0.45# cat hash
ae93f0d3b77f4ab42a4c90de5291a8a19bb6540f
root@ht:~/hashcat-0.45# ./hashcat-cliX... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
21,753 |
03-24-2013, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why is Ati so much faster than Nvidia at cracking passwords
Post: RE: Why is Ati so much faster than Nvidia at crack...
| The main reasons for AMD cards are faster than NV cards in general are:
- AMD GPU has more raw integer power (more SP), floating point is not important in crypto.
- AMD GPU/XOP CPU have a much better... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
23,419 |
03-30-2013, 08:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
Post: RE: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
| BTW, I've added wpaclean to online converter |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
17,692 |
04-11-2013, 07:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Probabilistic number generation
Post: RE: Probabilistic number generation
| you can take a look at the maskprocessor -q option, i think it's partially what you want to do. its not completely what you are looking for but maybe you can use it inside a script. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
9,314 |
05-21-2013, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Probabilistic number generation
Post: RE: Probabilistic number generation
| No but you can use a fifo to pipe it |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
9,314 |
05-25-2013, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX Titan Support
Post: RE: GTX Titan Support
| Beta version supports it already. Final version will be released somewhere between now and next defcon. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,501 |
06-23-2013, 10:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Update rules.txt with changes.txt
Post: RE: Update rules.txt with changes.txt
| The rejects should work like the ones from jtr, but only for the CPU rule engine. Makes no sense to reject single entries on fast hashes, it's faster to test them than add an if() which is executed fo... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,692 |
08-12-2013, 03:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Update rules.txt with changes.txt
Post: RE: Update rules.txt with changes.txt
| If you're willing to help I can add you as wiki autor |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,692 |
08-14-2013, 11:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
| For WPA, especially use -u 4096 - should be faster than 0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,046 |
08-18-2013, 12:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
| Yes, if you change performance settings you have to redo all work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,046 |
08-24-2013, 09:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is my test results normal?（oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690)
Post: RE: Is my test results normal?（oclhashcat-plu...
| AMD has both more raw power and a the better integer instruction set (floating-point doesn't matter) and thus it's better for crypto, since crypto only uses integer instructions. That's the reason why... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,588 |
08-29-2013, 09:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashes from freeradius-wpe
Post: RE: Hashes from freeradius-wpe
| cool stuff, moved to user contributions |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
5 |
17,540 |
08-29-2013, 09:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: v1.00 beta 11 ...
| ... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.
happy testing!! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,321 |
09-03-2013, 01:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.00 beta 11 ...
Post: RE: v1.00 beta 11 ...
| Yes, when you use only 1 hash and brute-force mode :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
5 |
6,321 |
09-03-2013, 02:48 PM |
