Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Having problem with Tesla C2070
Post: RE: Having problem with Tesla C2070
no idea then. have you tried with oclHashcat-plus? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
24 |
43,543 |
10-22-2011, 01:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: Having problem with Tesla C2070
Post: RE: Having problem with Tesla C2070
just run the example script in the package |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
24 |
43,543 |
10-25-2011, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: Having problem with Tesla C2070
Post: RE: Having problem with Tesla C2070
there are massive errors in this paste. maybe hardware defect? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
24 |
43,543 |
10-26-2011, 09:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Having problem with Tesla C2070
Post: RE: Having problem with Tesla C2070
try other card of same model in same system |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
24 |
43,543 |
10-26-2011, 10:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Having problem with Tesla C2070
Post: RE: Having problem with Tesla C2070
tesla's are slow. dont use them for sl3. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
24 |
43,543 |
10-27-2011, 09:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
you guys read this? https://hashcat.net/wiki/brute_force_in_oclhashcat_plus |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
11-16-2011, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
also note the maximum supported password plaintext length is 15 and the minimum for WPA is 8. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
11-18-2011, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
this is not about WPA, this applies to all algorithms. if the password is secure, this means long and with full charset, then nothing in the world can crack it. fortionally people do not use secure pa... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
11-19-2011, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
check out hashcats attack modes: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php#attack_modes
also check out hashcat-utils: https://hashcat.net/wiki/hashcat_utils
if you gained some experience how to use these mode... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
11-20-2011, 10:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
much faster. you can meassure yourself with the "time" command. point out the results to /dev/null to avoid influences from hdd/apps/whatever. i bet req.bin wil be 1000 times faster than 4 piped egrep... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
11-20-2011, 05:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to bruteforce?
Post: RE: How to bruteforce?
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
24 |
63,022 |
01-06-2012, 06:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
If you want them in the distribution, no problem. But they should be somehow different to the ones that already included. Otherwise it would make no sense. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
06-08-2012, 11:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
Thanks for this share! Actually cracked some of my uncrackable hashes list :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
06-08-2012, 10:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
blandyuk Wrote: (09-04-2012, 09:03 PM)
--
Updated graph attached with v0.09rc1
--
Thanks! Can I add them to release notes?
https://hashcat.net/misc/plus89_mh18.png
https://hashcat.net/misc/plus... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-04-2012, 09:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
kartan Wrote: (09-04-2012, 09:16 PM)
--
I found some typos in the help. Well, you might argue if these are typos or not but i think they all should have their first char be uppercase to be conform wi... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
blandyuk Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:03 AM)
--
Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 now :) will have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that.
--
Will update that info, thanks! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
M@LIK Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:37 AM)
--
Just a few notes before we dive into the hardcore stuff:
docs\user_manuals.txt(line_3) is old enough to be removed, or just tag it with "Outdated".
--help(line... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Hey Beta-testers,
after all the bugfixing its time for the 1st (and hopefully the only one) release candidate for oclHashcat-plus v0.09.
The last beta version before RC1 was b75.
There will ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-04-2012, 08:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
forumhero Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:02 AM)
--
regarding the chart, how about a bar graph? i think it better emphasize an increase in performance, rather than a line graph that's sloping downwards...
--
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
OK, rc2 is up with all the suggestions plus also increment mode disabled by default. The handling is now exactly as in maskprocessor/statprocessor. If you want increment mode, add -i. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 07:43 PM |