|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
forumhero Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:02 AM)
--
regarding the chart, how about a bar graph? i think it better emphasize an increase in performance, rather than a line graph that's sloping downwards...
--
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
M@LIK Wrote: (09-06-2012, 02:39 AM)
--
-m3000(FAGGOT!): -a0 fails to crack len_6 passwords unless it's piped using echo -n and not a dict. -a1, -a7 appends a char if the pass was len_7, See details h... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-06-2012, 11:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
blandyuk Wrote: (09-06-2012, 09:58 AM)
--
OK, but it's easier if it supports the 32 hex hashes as well as 16, not like its hard to do as all it need to do it split the 32 hex hash into 2 x 16 hex has... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-06-2012, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-07-2012, 05:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
| Thats fine, oclHashcat limits the maximum number of functions per rule |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
01-25-2013, 12:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
| No plans for that, actually its not possible because of some hard limitations from GPU |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
01-25-2013, 01:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Password Decoration Rule
Post: RE: Password Decoration Rule
| Yes that fine @ Wiki
There will be no problem @ hashcat pipe. There is also no such limit for slow hashes in oclHashcat-plus, thats only for fast hashes (different rule engine). |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
24 |
54,401 |
01-25-2013, 02:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Resume is broken
Post: RE: Resume is broken
| Hashcat will recognize if a wordlist changed (or was recreated). That makes sense in your case, so it's correct if it starts from 0. And that's correct to do it, because if you change it, the keyspace... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
24 |
24,089 |
07-18-2016, 01:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Resume is broken
Post: RE: Resume is broken
| The restore system is fine as it is and works well. It would be better to not use files that obviously include a BF keyspace. This is the root of your problem |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
24 |
24,089 |
07-19-2016, 08:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Resume is broken
Post: RE: Resume is broken
| Yes, that's the reason. The dictstat does not work with removeable drives. Anyway you shouldn't use files. If you want to skip repeating character you can use maskprocessor and pipe it to hashcat via ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
24 |
24,089 |
07-20-2016, 10:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| what chort says is correct, however oclHashcat-lite uses --increment mode by default. Even if his mask is set to 8x?l, it will start with 1x?l and iterate through 7x?l and ignores the 8th ?l. This is ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-07-2012, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| i can not reproduce this:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.10# ./oclHashcat-lite64.bin -m 3000 e52cac67419a9a224a3b108f3fa6cb6d -1 ?l ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
oclHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting...... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-08-2012, 11:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| i need something to reproduce, otherwise i cant fix it (if there is anything to fix).
yes, ?u will be translated into ?l and if both exists, it will get "merged", so the charset stays at 26 even if y... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-08-2012, 04:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| dont like the way how lm is done in lite, plus will be different. suggestions are welcome |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-09-2012, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| OK! check out the new oclHashcat-plus beta in /beta. I have implented it that way. It is writing the cracked halfes to outfile/screen AND to hashcat.pot and you can run at any time:
Quote:
--
oclH... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-09-2012, 06:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
mastercracker Wrote: (02-10-2012, 03:35 PM)
--
1) When you do the --show, having the ability to do also --remove for the fully cracked hash would be great.
--
already implemented! opposite of --show... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-10-2012, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| @f0cker thats the correct behaivior. if its not correct displayed in your shell its more likely its a terminal emulation problem. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| @mastercracker latest beta supports LM chunks, try out pls |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
undeath Wrote: (02-23-2012, 05:11 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (02-23-2012, 05:07 PM)
--
@f0cker thats the correct behaivior. if its not correct displayed in your shell its more likely its a terminal emulatio... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
Post: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
| Finally, i've got access to a gtx680 system.
Big thanks to MrUltimate!!
Windows 7, 64 bit
ForceWare 301.10
CUDA 4.2
GTX680, stock clocks
oclHashcat-lite 0.10b26
Code:
--
0 ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
23 |
70,083 |
03-30-2012, 09:50 PM |
