|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
l30n Wrote: (06-30-2016, 09:51 AM)
--
Well, I don't have AMD
Quote:
--
OpenCL Platform #1: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
- Device #1: Intel(R) Core(... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 09:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| Good because I tested the CPU version of Intel myself and it worked. However I did not test the GPU version. So that means both AMD and Intel (at least the GPU part) have a different JIT than NVidia f... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
winxp5421 Wrote: (06-30-2016, 11:59 AM)
--
i have 5 machines total 3 are windows 10 and 2 are windows 7.
windows 10 machine one (nvidia) no issues
windows 10 machine two (amd) catalyst 15.12 missin... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 12:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| That could explain it. Can you completely uninstall in one of the windows 7 machines the drivers. Also make sure the OpenCL.dll is removed (I think it will be not uninstalled). Then remove it by hand,... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
06-30-2016, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| This is a nice hack, thanks |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-21-2016, 09:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| I've added this hack to the current upstream and created a beta: https://hashcat.net/beta/
Can you please try it out? Make sure to _not_ have set the TMP variable when you try the new beta |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-21-2016, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
07-24-2016, 03:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing
| No need for such a thing anymore with v3.10, it's done automatically. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
23 |
39,240 |
08-23-2016, 09:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
| this have been discussed very often. i can not increase the support easily. its to much code change. well, maybe for brute-force, but on there its useless. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
01-03-2012, 10:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
01-11-2012, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
| I did some tests. For example, due to its caching architecture, if we want to support 64 char passwords with oclHashcat-plus it will require 16gb host memory. Otherwise it wont start. The speed droppe... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
05-16-2012, 10:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| I dont confirm. I guess the problem is the = char, as already stated by forumhero. Try with --gpu-watchdog 80 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-21-2012, 06:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
| In theory yes, but then we would require special Kernels for each Hash-lenght (in steps of 4). If you take a look at the kernels directory, it would cause the program to explode. I'm afraid we have to... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
05-21-2012, 06:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
| Only for rule-based attacks. However, would it make sens for BF? no. For Permutation? No. For Combinator and Hybrid? Maybe. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
05-22-2012, 10:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| maybe you need to gpu bios flash |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-22-2012, 10:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-27-2012, 04:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus share the same code when it comes to temperate management. Double check this issue again, pls. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-29-2012, 02:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
| Hm the only change between them is that plus uses a new ADL library. In this case you have to wait for a new -lite version. It will be used automatically in the next version. Then check it again. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-30-2012, 09:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
|
Incisive Wrote: (06-08-2012, 04:33 AM)
--
Agreed; that's why I suggested automated build scripts. Those, admittedly, take effort and work to set up, maintain, and test, but they do make the various ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
06-08-2012, 10:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and above
Post: RE: Support recovery of passwords of length 16 and...
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (06-07-2012, 02:47 PM)
--
However I believe this would be against the hashcat license rules, which seems a shame.
Another point atom once made against torrents is that he would like... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
22 |
50,764 |
06-08-2012, 10:19 AM |
