|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: anyone using pci-e riser cables?
Post: RE: anyone using pci-e riser cables?
| mrb is on this forum: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1284.html |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
20 |
63,181 |
06-29-2012, 01:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
| new plus will support generic md5(salt.pass) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,866 |
08-06-2012, 02:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
| Become a beta-tester is OK, all you need to do is to send me a test-plan. This ensures you are not trying to become a beta-tester so you have the new algorithms earlier. Otherwise just wait for the ne... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,866 |
08-09-2012, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
| will latest version markov kicked in and changed everything. you can try --markov-disable. the wiki needs to be updated, that is true |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,866 |
08-10-2012, 09:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Thanks mastercracker!
I have removed the bugs that have been fixed by cat 12.8 in your original post.
Also notice it might be neccessary to compile the kernels again with cat 12.8 but currently this... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-17-2012, 11:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| v48 is up but this is only compiled with catalyst 12.8. there should be no changes to the stated bugs. there is no need to test again before i fixed them. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-17-2012, 11:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I tried to reproduce this one:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
But it was cracked fine. Please verify |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-19-2012, 04:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 12 fails. Everything else works.
--
New version is up, other bugs still exist. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-20-2012, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 141 Nothing works
--
New version is up, pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-21-2012, 11:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I am not sure. My testhashes look like this:
echo -n 1306 | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 141 '$episerver$*0*Mzc2NzY1NTU0MTM3NDIxOA==*ITBVvl4lw3w7UGLk/soqInuRkos='
echo -n 56038 ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-21-2012, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I tried to fix the bugs with 2711 and 2811 but they are driver related. Next thing is this:
Quote:
--
- Progress and rejected counters wrong.
--
@mastercracker: How can I reproduce? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| It depends on what you define a long salt. On -m 1710 supported are salts up to length 16. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 04:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Dynamic salt length should work now (New version uploaded). Here are the requested hashes:
Quote:
--
$episerver$*0*NzYyNDg4MDUxMTEx*IdPKaPmk3qyjeth39wskfa3Uei4=
$episerver$*0*MTAwMzA2NzU2MzA2NA==*A... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-22-2012, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
|
Quote:
--
- For -m 1710 sha512($pass.$salt), Bruteforce on length 4 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 1800 sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix), -a 1 fails for length 15.
--
Should be fixed with b55, pl... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-29-2012, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| continue here pls:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1517.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-29-2012, 09:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,866 |
09-05-2012, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
| I am getting error reports on the low-end nvidia cards. Seems to be a general problem. On my 560Ti it works fine, so I guess it must be a cross-compiler problem. Did the older version work? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,494 |
01-04-2013, 11:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
| are you on 32-bit xp as well? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,494 |
01-04-2013, 05:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
| Multiple bugs caused by XP 32bit have been fixed. You have to wait for the next release or update to Win7 64bit or so. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,494 |
01-08-2013, 11:27 AM |
