|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| mastercracker, are you testing on single hash or multihash? its two different kernels |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-12-2012, 06:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| fixed (on amd)
Quote:
--
- For -m 0 MD5, bruteforce of length 2, 4 and 8 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 900 MD4, Bruteforce on length 2,4,8 and 12 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 100... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-12-2012, 07:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| i will remove the fixed issues from the original post, so its easier for me to track them |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-12-2012, 07:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| Fixed @ AMD:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), bruteforce on length 2 and 4 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 130 sha1(unicode($pass).$salt), bruteforce on length 2 and 4 fails... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-13-2012, 10:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| fixed:
Quote:
--
-m 11 broken
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: HD5750 on v45
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-14-2012, 06:20 PM)
--
I did not do all algos on v47 as it takes a lot of time but I can confirm that everything works for -m 11 on my HD5750. Was there anything else changed... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 11:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| when you find some time, please redo all tests with v47, i am a bit confused now whats all fixed and whats still left.
at least two things i know that are not working:
- -m 1800 sometimes does not w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-14-2012, 11:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
|
Quote:
--
As a final note, I don't know what the exact problem was with -m 11 and what was the fix but in the real world, there are also Joomla with 16 characters salt. Ideally to crack those we w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
08-15-2012, 03:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: current v44 status
Post: RE: current v44 status
| continue here pls : https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1523.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,474 |
09-01-2012, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How to recover password by truecrypt
Post: RE: How to recover password by truecrypt
| I'd say dictionary and even dictionary-based attacks can be done against TC. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
18 |
99,798 |
09-10-2013, 09:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to recover password by truecrypt
Post: RE: How to recover password by truecrypt
| If you have an Idea how the password could look like and you can not create the candidates with one of the builtin attack-modes I recommend writing your own password candidate generator and simply pip... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
18 |
99,798 |
05-14-2014, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD RX480 performance?
Post: RE: AMD RX480 performance?
| Thanks for benchmark, good to have a reference. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
18 |
38,801 |
07-01-2016, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
| No, because 14000 is a generic DES cracker, not a NetNTLM reverser. You recompute your chall data easily yourself, see the tool i've pushed. Just a single md5 |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
10-06-2016, 06:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
| This can be a bit tricky, so I've added a new tool to hashcat-utils called ct3_to_ntlm.c. It's on github already.
You need to know that that's two different versions for NetNTLMv1. The one with and... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
10-05-2016, 02:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
11-03-2016, 12:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
| No, netntlmv2 is completely different and has a dedicated hash-mode in hashcat. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
03-07-2017, 10:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| nice to hear that from you guys, thanks!! |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
17 |
65,591 |
09-16-2011, 06:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| Hello Hashcat users,
I am really proud to release this new version 0.06 of oclHashcat-plus to public. It contains a lot of new features, improvements, changes and bugfixes.
As you may already know, ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
17 |
65,591 |
09-16-2011, 02:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.06
| Thanks a lot for the nice feedback guys. Thats very motivating :)
My plans for the next version arent less than finally merging regular oclHashcat into oclHashcat-plus. That means combinator, hybri... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
17 |
65,591 |
09-21-2011, 05:51 PM |
