|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: NTLMv2 -- Not finding password
Post: RE: NTLMv2 -- Not finding password
| on oclHashcat-plus as well? It has a more sharp (but also more correct) hash parser |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
16 |
48,581 |
08-29-2013, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| For those who aren't following hashcat twitter, I'm experimenting with bitslice for DES/LM (-m 3000) on oclHashcat v1.38. So far everything is working fine but while working on DEScrypt (-m1500) somet... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-24-2015, 11:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| In theory yes, but my experience with NV and AMD in the past is that they don't care about bugs. When CUDA was young I've reported a ton of bugs and the same for AMD over the years. It takes alot of e... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-25-2015, 09:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| I tried, but 7.0 does not support inline asm for lop3 support |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-26-2015, 01:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| OK, News:
1) I got it so far that the speeds are ~ the same as the ones from DeepLearningJohnDoe. That is 766 MH/s vs. 967 MH/s (on a 980Ti +250MHz) using CUDA. Note that we do a markov-optimized sea... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
10-30-2015, 05:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
|
atom Wrote: (10-30-2015, 05:42 PM)
--
#define mysel(a,b,c) (bitselect (a,b,(c) ? 0xffffffff : 0)) -- Getting 251 MH/s
So there's a drop from 470 MH/s to 251 for dynamic salt support. I'll take it ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-02-2015, 03:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| Sounds good to me, 106.9 MH/s * 25 = 2672,5 |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-04-2015, 10:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
Post: RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc
| OK, so I'm reaching a point where it becomes harder to increase the speed alot. Here's some final values:
290x:
-m 1500: 350 MH/s with dynamic salt, 450 MH/s with fixed salt
-m 3000: 12000MH/s ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
16 |
25,335 |
11-10-2015, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't crack anything!
Post: RE: Can't crack anything!
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
16 |
19,063 |
12-05-2015, 03:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
| Only -j and -k accept rejection rules. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-17-2016, 06:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
| It will ignore the rules that are not compatible. All the other rules are executed. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-18-2016, 01:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
| With hashcat v3.00 there's a chance that some of the rules, for example the @ rule, can be support. This requires some extension. Since it's unclear yet which rules I can make to work and which not it... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-19-2016, 09:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat v3?
Post: RE: how to run hashcat legacy rules on new hashcat...
|
Quote:
--
In other words, for now, I need to split the provided rules\d3ad0ne.rule into GPU and CPU rules to have all of them run?
--
Yes, that's a pretty good idea.
Quote:
--
Is it planned to ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
23,766 |
07-20-2016, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions
Post: RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design qu...
| Note that 290x is no longer supported with latest AMD linux drivers. You need to manually install old drivers to use hashcat. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
16 |
18,472 |
08-29-2016, 09:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions
Post: RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design qu...
| the latest amdgpu beta driver works and support the 290x, but some hash-modes can't be used and it's generally slower than 15.12. The 15.12 is the best driver you can get for the 290x, but you can't u... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
16 |
18,472 |
08-29-2016, 11:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions
Post: RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design qu...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
16 |
18,472 |
08-31-2016, 01:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateContext(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateContext(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
| Please try with any other OpenCL program (not CUDA) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
24,642 |
09-16-2016, 09:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clCreateContext(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: ERROR: clCreateContext(): CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
| To get old Core2 running, you need to use an old version of Intels OpenCL runtime, but I can't remember which version it was. Newer versions are broken (not hashcats fault). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
24,642 |
10-30-2016, 03:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| 1. Do not confuse -d and -D, those are different options
2. To make use of all your devices, make sure to have the OpenCL runtime of all of them installed correctly |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| Please try again with latest hashcat beta, it will show us if your opencl installation is ok. You can find it here: https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 09:17 PM |
