Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug ?
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
30,464 |
02-04-2012, 01:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug ?
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.9 not want work on 5870 bug...
The problem with hd7970 is that you need the "8.921.2 RC11" version (based on catalyst 11.12) while all other cards need catalyst 12.1. Means you can not have both types in the same system as long AMD... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
30,464 |
02-05-2012, 02:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
Is the salt left or right side of the plaintext? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-21-2012, 03:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
you said something about 8 byte salts but each line of your salt.txt has 16 byte.
please also not that hashcat is not able to do hex-salts - only oclHashcat-* can do that.
|
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-21-2012, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-21-2012, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-22-2012, 10:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: which is the correct salt file format?
Post: RE: which is the correct salt file format?
tlc Wrote: (02-23-2012, 02:39 PM)
--
Atom, is there any chance that you would increase the number of characters to 16 for oclhashcat-*?
--
not planned, sorry |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
15 |
28,811 |
02-23-2012, 05:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore from settings
Post: RE: Restore from settings
Is this really about restore from position X? As far as I understant it, he wants to redo some of his favourite attacks without writing all the full cmdline again and again. If this is true, my recomm... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
15 |
45,550 |
03-18-2012, 07:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: Restore from settings
Post: RE: Restore from settings
Kakoose Wrote: (03-19-2012, 08:19 AM)
--
.bat files will work but it would really only be suitable for 1 or 2 hash types, hashlist etc. When dealing with over 10 or 20 hash types .bat is really just ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
15 |
45,550 |
03-19-2012, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: Restore from settings
Post: RE: Restore from settings
Actually I think the best way is to add support for presents in GUI, not in hashcat. Thats something that scandium might add if you ask him. Or you add it yourself since the GUI has been made open sou... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
15 |
45,550 |
03-27-2012, 03:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
yes that explains the rejects, but it still fullfills the buffer till its full or EOF before launching the kernel |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-25-2012, 12:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
While it buffers the words from the dictionary it checks if a word is undersized or oversized. If this is the case it adds for each word the number of RULES multiplied by the number of SALTS to the re... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-25-2012, 05:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
yeah, split the hash file. in theory you can split by 1 since it will not make any speed difference in sum. multihash support for salted hashes has just been added because of the lazyness of some user... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-26-2012, 10:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
if you do hybrid you wont notice the overhead. so it depends all on your attack. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-27-2012, 05:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Large IPB list issue
Post: RE: Large IPB list issue
you cant attack 210k MD5(phpBB3) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
38,230 |
04-29-2012, 05:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
[hr]
Welcome to the latest version of the hashcat flagship: oclHashcat-plus.
Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-plus/
I will go into detail about all the changes shortly, but fir... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
15 |
58,086 |
05-01-2012, 06:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.08
Yeah, was a hard way to v0.08. Thank you guys for the greetings. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
15 |
58,086 |
05-02-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithms
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithms
You can select multiple options.
More details can be found on the corresponding threads:
WoltLab BB3: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-68.html
Lotus HTTP Hash: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-12... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
15 |
35,525 |
05-09-2012, 10:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithms
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithm...
Updated the TrueCrypt selection. Only SHA512 will be supported. Not RIPEMD, not Whirlpool! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
15 |
35,525 |
05-09-2012, 08:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithms
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 Poll 3/3: Next algorithm...
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
15 |
35,525 |
05-18-2012, 05:04 PM |