|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| no i was off for some days, check your PM |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
01-09-2011, 12:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| you need sdk v2.2 not v2.3 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
01-09-2011, 07:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
Post: RE: ERROR: clBuildProgram<> -43
| fixed in oclHashcat v0.25 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
37,448 |
01-31-2011, 05:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| note this table have not been updated yet. it shows an 750mhz clock rate for the 6990 while it actually runs on 830mhz by default. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-10-2011, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| oh and i am sure it will break 10B mark in md5 with new oclHashcat lite :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-10-2011, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| oclHashcat-lite is not yet public, but it will support the following formats:
0 = MD5 200 = MySQL
1 = md5($pass.$salt) 300 = MySQL4.1/MySQL5
3 = md5(md5($pass)) ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-15-2011, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| the keyspace has increased. max plaintext size is exactly (inclusive) 15. even on unicode algorithms like DCC and NTLM. in case its a salted algo (1 and 101), the salt can be of any size BUT the sum o... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-15-2011, 09:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| 0.26b does not support it but oclHashcat-lite will do |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-26-2011, 08:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-29-2011, 10:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
09-29-2011, 10:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed :) 700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-02-2012, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| as chort already said, increase the -n value:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-02-2012, 03:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| since brute-force has been ported from lite and not from regular oclHashcat, speeds depend a lot on the number of hashes.
for example, with 2 hashes:
plus 0.07: Speed........: 5013.7M c/s Real, 5... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-03-2012, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| ok i found out what is the real source of the problem. i really had a hard time to find the reason because both, oclHashcat-plus and oclHashcat, share the same multihash binary search routine.
after... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-04-2012, 06:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
| have it already fixed in v0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-12-2012, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help making custom charset/rule
Post: RE: Help making custom charset/rule
| How does limiting the keyspace increase the overall speed? |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
33,906 |
03-27-2012, 03:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Help making custom charset/rule
Post: RE: Help making custom charset/rule
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (03-27-2012, 04:20 PM)
--
I think this whole thread is an extension of the “Pseudo Markov†request I made earlier.
--
This is absolutly not about markov. Its about a bug i... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
33,906 |
03-28-2012, 10:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help making custom charset/rule
Post: RE: Help making custom charset/rule
|
ZerXes Wrote: (03-27-2012, 08:23 PM)
--
another user have created a python script that generates cleartext-keys that fill the requirements that I can pass through to hashcat.
However the pythonscrip... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
33,906 |
03-28-2012, 10:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Help making custom charset/rule
Post: RE: Help making custom charset/rule
|
Quote:
--
Is 10 chars total
Is only the hexadecimal chars, 1 to F (Uppercase)
--
with maskprocessor
Code:
--
mp64.bin -1 123456789ABCDEF ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
--
Quote:
--
Contains at leas... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
33,906 |
03-28-2012, 08:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Help making custom charset/rule
Post: RE: Help making custom charset/rule
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (03-29-2012, 12:29 AM)
--
I understand the limitations of markov but I only used the name markov after a discussion I had with you some time ago. This is why I call it pseudo markov.
... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
33,906 |
03-29-2012, 10:09 AM |
