Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Directory Mode
Post: RE: Directory Mode
|
atom |
General Help
|
13 |
28,200 |
11-20-2011, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Directory Mode
Post: RE: Directory Mode
hard to say without investigating |
|
atom |
General Help
|
13 |
28,200 |
11-20-2011, 05:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Directory Mode
Post: RE: Directory Mode
to understand the concept of this, read the wiki:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/toggle_attack_with_rules |
|
atom |
General Help
|
13 |
28,200 |
12-12-2011, 10:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
what is the exact problem? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,921 |
01-30-2012, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
looks like you copied some strange html content in your report. i had to convert it to hex again and then it worked fine. here is my log:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.09# ./oclHashcat-lite... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,921 |
01-30-2012, 06:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Post: RE: oclhashcat-lite v0.8 Bug Report Thread
Yes, its already fixed in 0.09. Thanks for reporting! |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
13 |
26,921 |
02-01-2012, 09:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: md5($pass:$salt) support in PLUS version
Joomla has its own -m mode, its already supported. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
02-02-2012, 06:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: md5($pass:$salt) support in PLUS version
never saw 16 byte salts in the wild before. its however no problem, i can allow them. can be more specific what is possible? for example, is 1 byte salt possible, too? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
02-03-2012, 11:36 AM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
02-03-2012, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
there is no difference between windows and linux in the remove hash function. can you provide example files and commandlines so we can reproduce locally? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,106 |
04-11-2012, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
OK, I can reproduce it. Have to investigate. Thanks for reporting |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,106 |
04-12-2012, 05:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
OK, race-condition fixed. New version is in /beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,106 |
04-13-2012, 10:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Fixed with hashcat CPU. New version in /beta. Again, thanks for reporting! |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,106 |
04-14-2012, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
04-28-2012, 06:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
not uploaded yet, big new beta in the pipe |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
04-28-2012, 10:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: maskprocessor --increment
Post: RE: maskprocessor --increment
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
13 |
30,798 |
05-08-2012, 04:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: 16 byte salt support for joomla
Post: RE: 16 byte salt support for joomla
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
22,308 |
05-08-2012, 04:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: --remove isn't removing all hashes
Post: RE: --remove isn't removing all hashes
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
23,106 |
05-08-2012, 04:29 PM |