Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies [asc] Views Posted
    Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
I guess its all about the multihash -m 2611, -m 2711 and -m 2811 bug in AMD catalyst for < hd77xx. If it works fine on single hashes all you can do is to pray to AMD catalyst coder to fix this issue.
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 30,292 05-16-2012, 10:40 AM
    Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
We just wait for an AMD driver fix
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 30,292 05-21-2012, 06:29 PM
    Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
yes, its descrypt -m 1500
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 25,443 09-19-2012, 03:32 PM
    Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Yeah, he did not read https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack or not carefully enough
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 25,443 09-21-2012, 09:47 AM
    Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
No. kevin33 -> ?l?l?l?l?l?d?d
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 25,443 09-21-2012, 12:55 PM
    Thread: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
Post: RE: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
I guess he tried with oclHashat-lite since it makes 8400 on 7970 and now he tries with oclHashcat-plus which is ofc slower.
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 19,460 10-21-2012, 05:43 PM
    Thread: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
Post: RE: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
Use a file instead, then you dont need to escape
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 19,460 10-22-2012, 10:23 AM
    Thread: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
Post: RE: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
The reason to do this is not do use a command, to avoid the shell to interpret some of the special chars in your salt. So copy/paste the hash into a Textfile and save it and then use the textfile-name...
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 19,460 10-23-2012, 10:29 AM
    Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
You need at least 100/X in your progress to have an ETC displayed
 atom Old hashcat Support 13 22,263 10-23-2012, 10:32 AM
    Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Take the time it needs to inital display in -a 1 case and multiply it with the number of rules. That should work.
 atom Old hashcat Support 13 22,263 10-24-2012, 10:31 AM
    Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display.
 atom Old hashcat Support 13 22,263 10-25-2012, 09:13 AM
    Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Try a rule-file which contains a single ":" instead of NUL. This is a real empty rule.
 atom Old hashcat Support 13 22,263 10-26-2012, 10:06 AM
    Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Adding rules add some calculation overhead, thats why you have no "-" words / s. This is what the ETC is based on. Thats the reason. Its to slow to calculate it.
 atom Old hashcat Support 13 22,263 10-27-2012, 08:35 AM
    Thread: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
Post: RE: After format speed goes down 50% on HD 7970
The hashfile-name was ok, but your error is that you have seleted the wrong hash-mode. You are using -m 0 but your hash is salted, so you have to select the correct hash mode. See --help for a list of...
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 19,460 10-28-2012, 11:42 AM
    Thread: Help to start OclHashcat-lite on ati4870x2
Post: RE: Help to start OclHashcat-lite on ati4870x2
oclHashcat works with OpenCL. OpenCL runtime from AMD do not allow access to required fast memory for hd4xxx cards. For SL3 on hd4xxx cards use ighashgpu.
 atom Hardware 13 20,489 11-26-2012, 11:11 AM
    Thread: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
Post: RE: WPA/WPA2 in hashcat
It should be possible to port the code from oclHashcat to hashcat. But I am to busy with other features. If you guys can convince radix, matrix or xandadrel your chances are good :)
 atom Feature Requests 13 32,540 01-11-2013, 02:10 PM
    Thread: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Which driver is that
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 21,507 01-18-2013, 12:58 PM
    Thread: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Hm I am using the 560 Ti as well, and that driver. Only difference is that I am using Ubuntu 12.04.1
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 21,507 01-18-2013, 09:42 PM
    Thread: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.12 no responding
Protip: throw it away
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 21,507 01-20-2013, 05:03 PM
    Thread: It never stops running
Post: RE: It never stops running
No, its as radix said. He is missing a dictionary / mask so oclHashcat-plus went into stdin mode. Thats why it doesnt offer keyboard input
 atom Very old oclHashcat-plus Support 13 18,333 01-29-2013, 12:12 PM