|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
|
levsha Wrote: (02-02-2012, 01:24 AM)
--
@ Atom
Is HD 5970 faster then HD7970 in SL3? You wrote the speed of hd 7970 SL3: 2825M/s.
I tested on my 5970 SL3: 3600-4000 M/s.
--
yes. the 7970 is a si... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,201 |
02-02-2012, 06:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
Post: RE: oclHashcat running on the new AMD hd7970
| i have seen tripple 7970 configurations working |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
52 |
175,201 |
02-07-2012, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
martin.po21 Wrote: (02-06-2017, 11:39 PM)
--
However, I tested this on a capture file I already cracked and therefor I know capture is indeed valid (ATT?d?d?d network with default pass of 10 digits)-... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-07-2017, 11:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
rico Wrote: (02-07-2017, 01:01 AM)
--
Great stuff, handshake capturing always a tricky business. I just gave cap2hccapx a quick spin but didn't have much luck either I'm afraid. cap2hccapx seems to i... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-07-2017, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| After some testing, that error:
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx eapol size
--
and/or
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx signature
--
is somehow related to windows beta binaries. We'll try to fix. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-07-2017, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I've just upload hashcat beta 104. With it, you should be able to load the hccapx on windows, too. If it works I don't need the .cap. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-07-2017, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: New hccapx format explained
| A few days ago a user came into the #hashcat IRC channel and reported to have problems cracking one of his WPA handshake captures. No worries, the user knew the password to the WPA handshake so this s... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-06-2017, 10:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Hehe, I guess in that case it will not take long to update it again, allowing it for combining of packets :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-09-2017, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also note that this feature is kind of unique in the WPA/WPA2 cracking world. There's no other cracker (both commercial and non-commercial) that combines the packets in such a way that they produce at... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-08-2017, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
abdou99 Wrote: (02-10-2017, 02:29 PM)
--
If you are saying that both values: 0 and 1 are crackable
so what's the news?
value = 0 ==> 50% Crackable
value = 1 ==> 100% Crackable
is that what are ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-10-2017, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You can use the 3rd (optional) parameter of cap2hccapx to select a specific ESSID only. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-15-2017, 09:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Yeah, I understood that. It's very likely wpaclean will break you cap (as aircrack-ng -J does) so there's no easy way to filter it. That's why I said that cap2hccapx supports filtering. He just need t... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-15-2017, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| That's a feature, I explained it in the initial post. We also want to be able to crack the password the user set, not just the password on the AP (for man-in-the-middle attacks). Please re-read the po... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
02-16-2017, 09:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| For short readers: Everything is fine here. For all others, here's our analysis:
The Handshake in the cap has the following entries:
M1 and M2 from the first handshake
M1, M2, M3 and M4 from the se... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
03-10-2017, 11:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| That's some local problem on your side then. Works for everyone else. Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,622 |
03-11-2017, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| In fact, I would love to see it beaten. We will all benefit from it.
GOGOGOGO Guys!!
|
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,604 |
03-22-2012, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| hashcat 0.39 released, now everybody can participate |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,604 |
03-23-2012, 11:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,604 |
03-25-2012, 01:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| Should be back, it was just limited to the top 10 |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,604 |
03-27-2012, 03:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
| This is the write-up how I rebuild the new best64.rule out of all the submissions but for real-life use.
This new best64.rule will go into all hashcat distributions.
I took arex best 80's results po... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,604 |
03-30-2012, 02:27 PM |
