Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: V47 bugs Nvidia
Post: RE: V47 bugs Nvidia
continue here pls:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1517.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,359 |
08-29-2012, 09:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Dictionary Analyzer v1.0
Post: RE: Dictionary Analyzer v1.0
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
12 |
33,027 |
09-01-2012, 08:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat gui md5 problem
Post: RE: hashcat gui md5 problem
the 580 is much higher clocked |
|
atom |
General Help
|
12 |
21,813 |
09-03-2012, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: 3 questions..
Post: RE: 3 questions..
well........ because nvidia sucks for hash cracking
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison
https://www.golubev.com/gpuest.htm
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
29,066 |
09-04-2012, 10:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: Stop auto incrementing
Post: RE: Stop auto incrementing
New users are irritated to much by a cracking-tool which is not doing using auto-increment per default and of course we want to make it as easy as possible for them to get into this not so easy progra... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
20,479 |
09-05-2012, 11:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Stop auto incrementing
Post: RE: Stop auto incrementing
Rolf Wrote: (09-05-2012, 11:32 AM)
--
Yea, but what if you have 1k+ of masks, each of separate length ?
Max len approach sucks.
Either no default increment(like it was be4) or --no-increment would ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
20,479 |
09-05-2012, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: Oracle 11g Format
Post: RE: Oracle 11g Format
This is how an Oracle 11g hash should look like:
5daf093f2380a13dcd73ad07cfbf788f6cc72a39:52313134845822305584
password is 0747 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
27,495 |
10-18-2012, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
The lots-of-wordlists bug is fixed in b2 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,855 |
01-05-2013, 09:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 1
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 1
Seems to be that old card, cant reproduce locally. Try with -n 1 -u 1, also try 32 bit version and most important, update your driver (by hand, not by using distribution driver). |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
28,457 |
02-15-2013, 12:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat v0.43
Post: hashcat v0.43
* changes v0.42-> v0.43:
Download here: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
Release with lots of new algorithms especially for pentesters:
WPA/WPA2
Password Safe
IKE-PSK
NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv2
... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
12 |
36,477 |
03-07-2013, 02:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA512 unix hash
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA51...
Seems to be 32 bit version, please open a ticket on TRAC |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
33,265 |
03-15-2013, 11:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA512 unix hash
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA51...
1. This is typical unix commandline parameter syntax. You have to remove the = char between key and value to make it work.
hashcat-cli32.exe --hash-type 1800 --attack-mode 0 ..\..\shadow-ubuntu-1-tes... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
33,265 |
03-12-2013, 10:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA512 unix hash
Post: RE: Hashcat 0.43 not successfully decrypting SHA51...
I've reconstructed your hash by hand:
Quote:
--
$6$DNRlEKWm$tEcdDjEuxYJFaA41eq1Ro4SHot3ov3SHeLo4LQqKNtzjHCNExT5kED8KpIGzQZrt758sa/WwCnQsgRS80EHRT/
--
As you can see here, it cracks fine now:... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
33,265 |
03-12-2013, 10:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 1
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 1
That error didnt tell me anything of use :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
28,457 |
04-10-2013, 08:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
I dont get what the problem is here. The numbers shown are the ones to expect. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-19-2013, 10:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: 5970 slow?
Post: RE: 5970 slow?
uzomoshi Wrote: (04-19-2013, 12:43 PM)
--
Just curious, why is salt + pass significantly slower than pass + salt ?
Could it be done faster for single salt situations?
--
No, that is because of the... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
22,929 |
04-19-2013, 04:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat v0.43
Post: RE: hashcat v0.43
release thread is here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2160.html |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
12 |
36,477 |
04-22-2013, 09:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
Post: RE: hashcat 0.46 memory trouble in cmd file?
good find. can you do a trac ticket? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
22,819 |
08-04-2013, 05:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: One 7970 running slower than other??
Post: RE: One 7970 running slower than other??
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
21,049 |
08-08-2013, 06:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: One 7970 running slower than other??
Post: RE: One 7970 running slower than other??
wait, wtf is this? fake 7970? bought at black market? :) you sure its a real one? never saw this before. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
21,049 |
08-08-2013, 03:47 PM |