Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080: errors
Post: RE: GTX 1080: errors
Drop the Mesa driver, it's known to break. But it also seems your OpenCL ICD is somehow bugged. I'd recommend to not use The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali), the OpenCL integrati... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
13,777 |
02-16-2017, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: GTX 1080: errors
Post: RE: GTX 1080: errors
You need to update your opencl.dll. Please read https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do and follow it 100%, especially th... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
13,777 |
02-20-2017, 02:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Typical error when you try to load hccapx into too old hashcat version |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-07-2017, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Either the The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) maintainer need to update the version or you use binary version from hashcat.net or you compile from sources |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-08-2017, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Yes, for hashcat that is it. OpenCL might be different, but this is not OpenCL support forum! |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-09-2017, 12:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hashcat v3.0?
Post: RE: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hash...
No, except for SCRYPT based algorithms, the gpu ram doesn't matter when it comes to raw performance. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
46,632 |
06-30-2017, 09:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: LUKS Support
Post: RE: LUKS Support
Quote:
--
i have zuluCrypt its too many password to test manualy how to automate it?
--
Quote:
--
Can it support LVM header from a raid device ?
--
No, LUKS has it's own header |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
12 |
40,931 |
10-01-2017, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Restore Fails
Post: RE: Restore Fails
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
8,646 |
11-07-2017, 11:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: Restore Fails
Post: RE: Restore Fails
It is (but not with a .restore file written from v3.6). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
8,646 |
11-20-2017, 08:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: Not finding my own set password
Post: RE: Not finding my own set password
illyria Wrote: (12-16-2018, 01:03 AM)
--
LoZio Wrote: (12-14-2018, 07:22 PM)
--
[...]
Guess.Mask.......: passpas?l [9]
--
I am guessing the issue relates to the mask, somehow. That mask is only 8... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
6,010 |
12-16-2018, 11:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: Not finding my own set password
Post: RE: Not finding my own set password
Yes, very likely an invisible (control) character then. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
6,010 |
01-10-2019, 02:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Crackpos incorrect
Post: RE: Crackpos incorrect
The password output given by hashcat is based on the crackpos. IOW, if the crackpos is wrong, the password is wrong, which is not the case. If you want to know more about the details, see here:
htt... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
5,625 |
02-15-2019, 04:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Crackpos incorrect
Post: RE: Crackpos incorrect
You cannot measure the efficiency of the attack based on crackpos as this is a parallel execution with millions of workitems in it. It is up to the OpenCL runtime which one to execute in which order. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
5,625 |
02-16-2019, 10:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat WPA benchmark not starting at all
Post: RE: hashcat WPA benchmark not starting at all
Why use such an old driver? Stick to the latest. Also, try https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
8,216 |
03-18-2019, 09:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
if left side is of length 4, 8 or 12 its most performant. there is one exception if you get this warning:
WARNING: words in dict_left < .... Can't gain full performance
in this case its better to p... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-13-2010, 02:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
use --increment, see https://ob-security.info/?p=116 too. my recommendation: do not try to crack passes < length 4 using oclHashcat |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-14-2010, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhash question about length
Post: RE: oclhash question about length
something must be wrong with your test, i did my own and everything works. here is each step:
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.24# cat ints
1
11
111
1111
11111
111111
1111111
11111111
111111111
111... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
25,525 |
12-15-2010, 09:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat bug
Post: RE: Hashcat bug
hi mastercracker, thanks for report. i can confirm this is a bug. as a workaround, do not use -e and --remove in combination :-) |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
21,546 |
01-16-2011, 10:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat bug
Post: RE: Hashcat bug
add the salts to a file and use it either on the left or the right side. of course this depends on the algo. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
21,546 |
01-28-2011, 01:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat bug
Post: RE: Hashcat bug
oclHashcat is not designed for single wordlist attacks, sorry |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
21,546 |
01-28-2011, 10:23 PM |