Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
no, because if you change the dictionary the stored numbers become invalid.
you can work-around the line counter by using |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,237 |
04-16-2012, 03:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
if there is enough demand, yes |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,237 |
04-17-2012, 05:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Usability requests
Post: RE: Usability requests
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
11 |
22,850 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Cracking DES With HashCat
Post: RE: Cracking DES With HashCat
I though that has been fixed in the meanwhile? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
41,268 |
05-16-2012, 10:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
i got several of the same reports. its because i am compiling the binaries on ubuntu 12.04 which is using a bleeding edge new glibc. most of the other distributions do not yet ship it. maybe it will c... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
05-23-2012, 04:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Table To File Stopped Working
Post: RE: Table To File Stopped Working
should be the same issue as discussed here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1016.html |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
24,858 |
05-30-2012, 09:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
still no workaround for this found. anyone has an idea? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
06-02-2012, 09:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: Table To File Stopped Working
Post: RE: Table To File Stopped Working
Sounds strange. Can you give some commandline you use plus the table file etc for reproduce? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
24,858 |
06-03-2012, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Table To File Stopped Working
Post: RE: Table To File Stopped Working
I tried it and can confirm it. But it is not a bug or something. Its just that hashcat can not generate the password plains fast enough. On my 8 core bulldozer it makes ~ 280k/s. That is still faster ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
24,858 |
06-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Table To File Stopped Working
Post: RE: Table To File Stopped Working
Just take a look at the Real c/s. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
24,858 |
06-05-2012, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Fan 100% but Not Cracking In HCPlus
Post: RE: Fan 100% but Not Cracking In HCPlus
No I dont think so. Try to disable the retain support --gpu-temp-retain 0. If the problem disappears, its somewhere in there. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,399 |
06-11-2012, 09:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Fan 100% but Not Cracking In HCPlus
Post: RE: Fan 100% but Not Cracking In HCPlus
I am sure its not an oclHashcat-plus. Maybe a driver problem. New drivers are extremly buggy. More than ever. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
11,399 |
06-11-2012, 02:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
Sooner or later everyone will update. But for the release (but only for this) version I will try to compile it on an older Ubuntu. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
06-20-2012, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
07-04-2012, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
I am thinking about dropping support for permutation-attack from oclHashcat-plus. It will still stay in hashcat CPU and in hashcat-utils as well as stand-alone binary.
Thoughts? Who uses it? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-13-2012, 10:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
sorry?
toggle rules and permutation attack have nothing in common |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-13-2012, 10:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
yeah i agree.. other thoughts? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-13-2012, 10:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
it costs me a lot of time developing the kernels. 25% of these are because of permutation attack. program architecture will be smaller and the diskspace reduces because we dont need the _a4 kernel any... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-13-2012, 12:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
Post: RE: Dropping support for -a 4 permutation-attack
OK, if no one explicitly cares about this feature I think we can remove it. It will still stay in the repository if we need it back. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
10,338 |
08-14-2012, 09:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: SQL 2012 password hash
Post: RE: SQL 2012 password hash
OK, can we have some example hash/plain pairs please |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
11 |
42,569 |
08-17-2012, 11:48 PM |