Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
the post was not deleted, just splitted into a seperate thread, since this thread is about the challange, not about strange rule engine behaiviors. please read the https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1027... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,607 |
03-31-2012, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
frekvent Wrote: (03-31-2012, 12:10 AM)
--
It turns out that "}}D1{" can be simplified to a single "]".
--
This is cool. I will update the post and the best64.rule. Thanks! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,607 |
03-31-2012, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Thanks to dakykilla:
Quote:
--
o0to0b o0t o0b
--
can be written as just "o0b" :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,607 |
04-21-2012, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Its all about the slow ones, like md5crypt, phpass, WPA/WPA2... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,607 |
05-06-2012, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
Post: RE: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
47 |
208,551 |
04-07-2013, 06:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
Post: RE: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
I've used 0.15 beta which is not yet public. You need to wait for next release. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
47 |
208,551 |
04-10-2013, 08:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
Post: RE: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
AFAIK Android 5.x uses a different scheme, therefore it will not work |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
47 |
208,551 |
05-26-2015, 12:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
Post: RE: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
The optimal maskfile, according to the policy you've posted, would be:
Quote:
--
?u?l?l?l
?l?u?l?l
?l?l?u?l
?l?l?l?u
--
You can generate them with PACK 0.4 |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
47 |
208,551 |
05-04-2016, 12:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
There is plenty of discussion about this on this forum, just use search please. There is currently no plan to change this. But never say never :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-04-2013, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
I doubt its that high, otherwise I would have added it already :) I guess its the opposite, nearly nothing. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-05-2013, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
I think there is a misunderstanding. The performance increase based on the limitation is for fast hashes only. WPA and other slow algorithms are not affected. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-07-2013, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
The structure of the program changed a lot, that is true, but regarding to the length limitation there was no change. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-08-2013, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
The full rockyou analysis:
1 = 50 (0.0%)
2 = 341 (0.0%)
3 = 2480 (0.02%)
4 = 18016 (0.13%)
5 = 259169 (1.81%)
6 = 1947848 (13.58%)
7 = 2506256 (17.47%)
8 = 2965991 (20.68%)
9 = 2190993 (15.27%)
10 = ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-09-2013, 10:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
I'm impressed by you guys. This topic seems to be really important for you. So many discussions now and in the past... I'm currently working on other things. Once I finished them I will look again int... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
01-11-2013, 02:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
If you just want to check the remaining 1002313 you can use hashcat CPU. It supports WPA up to length 64 in latest version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
03-10-2013, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
support for length > 15 is my primary goal for next release |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,740 |
05-27-2013, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Hey Jeffrey,
thanks for your honest words, I appreciate it. This thread somehow created more attraction that I've expected. Even more since the reason for me to add 1Password keychain was "just to le... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,063 |
04-16-2013, 06:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Yeah I see what you mean. k/s can be easily misread as keys/sec. Maybe I should change this. If you want I can grant you access to the hashcat beta section so you can run it on your System. Currently ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,063 |
04-16-2013, 07:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Just wanted to post some new results:
I've ported to GPU code from OpenCL to CUDA. My NVidia gtx560Ti (budget card) is doing 206 KH/s.
UPDATE: Beta-Users reporting the gtx580 is running at 365.2 KH/... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,063 |
04-17-2013, 12:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Post: RE: Agilebits 1Password support and Design Flaw?
Beta-Testers: A new beta-version (beta5) for Linux and Windows for both AMD and NVidia GPU's. Its up in /beta and also contains the new Samsung Android PIN/Password cracking hash-mode 5800.
@epixoip:... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
44 |
362,063 |
04-17-2013, 01:25 PM |