Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies [asc] Views Posted
    Thread: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
Post: RE: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary f...

You just need to run ./hashcat instead of hashcat
atom hashcat 10 17,717 12-01-2016, 07:24 PM
    Thread: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
Post: RE: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary f...

Yeah, looks good. Have fun!
atom hashcat 10 17,717 12-02-2016, 03:44 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

you can do: Quote: -- hashcat64 -a 6 dict.txt ?a?a -i --stdout | hashcat64 -m 0 -a 0 -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt --
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 03:46 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

Yes, add --status --status-timer 1 to the 2nd
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 07:50 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

Not with stdin input, because hashcat can't know the number of candidates it will recieve via stdin.
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 07:56 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

Yes, that will work
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 08:15 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

number-of-words-in-wordlist1 * number-of-words-in-wordlist2 * number-of-rules
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 08:23 PM
    Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary

in hybrid mode with -a 6 the ?a?a gets expanded into number of words internally, so it 95*95
atom hashcat 10 14,669 12-02-2016, 08:24 PM
    Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me

https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_is_the_maximum_supported_salt_length
atom hashcat 10 9,079 01-26-2017, 09:49 AM
    Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key

Can you please post example data trace (all 8 iterations). Like, whats the ct/pt with each iteration
atom hashcat 10 12,932 02-08-2017, 11:54 AM
    Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key

Yes, you can crack it with hashcat, but you need to patch the kernel. I really love such home-cooked algorithms. They always do something stupid, so does this one. I didn't write a poc, but I'm prett...
atom hashcat 10 12,932 02-09-2017, 01:18 PM
    Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key

I think it's mostly copy / paste of the -m 14000
atom hashcat 10 12,932 02-10-2017, 07:47 PM
    Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me

Learn OpenCL
atom hashcat 10 9,079 02-13-2017, 11:55 PM
    Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems

It's none of the above cases. The problem is that the user has an rejected input: Quote: -- Rejected.........: 1/1 (100.00%) -- Which means that the wordlist contains a word < length 8. So e...
atom hashcat 10 11,325 02-23-2017, 01:35 AM
    Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems

There's a solution for that. Just run hashcat in --stdout mode and pipe it to hashcat doing the cracking. Like this: Quote: -- hashcat64.exe -r D:\rules\temprule.txt D:\custom.txt | hashcat64.ex...
atom hashcat 10 11,325 02-23-2017, 10:19 AM
    Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems

In the past, hashcat worked like you suggested. The problem is that such an on-cpu rule engine would be to slow to feed password candidates on the faster ones of the slow hash family (like md5crypt). ...
atom hashcat 10 11,325 02-24-2017, 12:25 AM
    Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt

No, it's more like 11208 sounds to be correct, see here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B1S_t1Z0KsqByH3pNkYUM-RCFMu860nlfSsYEqOoqco/edit#gid=1439721324
atom hashcat 10 9,323 03-07-2017, 10:02 AM
    Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt

I have seen the same error with AMDGPU-pro 16.40. This is a driver issue, not a hashcat issue.
atom hashcat 10 9,323 03-08-2017, 09:54 AM
    Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt

How can we know, the segfault occurs inside the AMD library
atom hashcat 10 9,323 03-09-2017, 12:32 PM
    Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt

Yes it is, we're lucky :)
atom hashcat 10 9,323 03-11-2017, 09:47 PM