Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
Post: RE: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary f...
You just need to run ./hashcat instead of hashcat |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
17,717 |
12-01-2016, 07:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
Post: RE: bash: ./hashcat64.bin: cannot execute binary f...
Yeah, looks good. Have fun! |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
17,717 |
12-02-2016, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
you can do:
Quote:
--
hashcat64 -a 6 dict.txt ?a?a -i --stdout | hashcat64 -m 0 -a 0 -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt
--
|
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 03:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Yes, add --status --status-timer 1 to the 2nd |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 07:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Not with stdin input, because hashcat can't know the number of candidates it will recieve via stdin. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 07:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 08:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
number-of-words-in-wordlist1 * number-of-words-in-wordlist2 * number-of-rules |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 08:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
in hybrid mode with -a 6 the ?a?a gets expanded into number of words internally, so it 95*95 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 08:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_is_the_maximum_supported_salt_length |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,079 |
01-26-2017, 09:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Can you please post example data trace (all 8 iterations). Like, whats the ct/pt with each iteration |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-08-2017, 11:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Yes, you can crack it with hashcat, but you need to patch the kernel.
I really love such home-cooked algorithms. They always do something stupid, so does this one. I didn't write a poc, but I'm prett... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-09-2017, 01:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
I think it's mostly copy / paste of the -m 14000 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-10-2017, 07:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: help me
Post: RE: help me
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,079 |
02-13-2017, 11:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
It's none of the above cases. The problem is that the user has an rejected input:
Quote:
--
Rejected.........: 1/1 (100.00%)
--
Which means that the wordlist contains a word < length 8. So e... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,325 |
02-23-2017, 01:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
There's a solution for that. Just run hashcat in --stdout mode and pipe it to hashcat doing the cracking. Like this:
Quote:
--
hashcat64.exe -r D:\rules\temprule.txt D:\custom.txt | hashcat64.ex... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,325 |
02-23-2017, 10:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
In the past, hashcat worked like you suggested. The problem is that such an on-cpu rule engine would be to slow to feed password candidates on the faster ones of the slow hash family (like md5crypt). ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,325 |
02-24-2017, 12:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
No, it's more like 11208 sounds to be correct, see here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B1S_t1Z0KsqByH3pNkYUM-RCFMu860nlfSsYEqOoqco/edit#gid=1439721324 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-07-2017, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
I have seen the same error with AMDGPU-pro 16.40. This is a driver issue, not a hashcat issue. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-08-2017, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
How can we know, the segfault occurs inside the AMD library |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-09-2017, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Yes it is, we're lucky :) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-11-2017, 09:47 PM |