|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| new version will rock massive in single hash cracking :) check out the forum often, i will release a public beta soon. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-18-2011, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| there is no such 12 character limit. you can already use a 8 + 4 mask (8 on the left, 4 on the right). 0.26 will include BFI_INT, otherwise these numbers wouldnt be possible :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-20-2011, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's Linux
Post: RE: Install Oclhashcat 0.25 w/multiple HD 5970's L...
| that is absolutly correct. the brute-force idea was ok in the past where hashes were ciphers and therefore limited somehow. for example DES which is limited to 8 chars or its children like LM which is... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
36,156 |
02-20-2011, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
Post: RE: Possible OCLhashcat+ bug
| that was a good hint mastercracker. i found somthing. it is exactly as i said in the beginning. it is salted with a null-byte. or better said its the unicode version of something. take the first examp... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
20,373 |
02-26-2011, 09:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| Hey guys, just wanted to inform you about the latest updates of the SDK and Catalyst driver.
I am very disappointed of what AMD does in the last time period. There are lots of discussions on AMD d... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
08-19-2011, 10:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: RE: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| some addition: windows user have that 100% cpu bug since long time. so if you are on windows and you dont care about the the 100% cpu bug you can upgrade to 11.7 or 11.8, whatever you like more. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
08-19-2011, 03:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: RE: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| more news: while i was developing a new algorithm for oclHashcat-plus i got some strange error that a hash was not found that should be have found since i knew the plain text. but it did not. to make ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
08-19-2011, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: RE: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| conclusion:
========
on linux: use either cat 11.4 or 11.5
on windows: use cat 11.8
|
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
08-19-2011, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: RE: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| ok more news. while developing a new algorithm i found out the cat 11.5 on linux create false positives on the 2nd gpu. thats only on 6990 not 5970. when using cat 11.4 everything works fine.
conclu... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
08-21-2011, 07:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not cracking ntlm hashes
Post: RE: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not crackin...
| first run looks fine for me. but the 2nd not, however the commands were the same. what do i miss? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
25,591 |
08-29-2011, 10:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not cracking ntlm hashes
Post: RE: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not crackin...
| no,i can not reproduce it. can you please provide test_hash2.txt and 3tx3t.txt? maybe the problem is inside these files. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
25,591 |
08-31-2011, 09:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
Post: RE: AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8
| good news about RC version of 11.9 driver from AMD dev forum: https://forums.amd.com/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=390&threadid=153211
it says the 100% cpu bug is finally fixed. the RC version is for wi... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
21,945 |
09-13-2011, 06:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug -o option
Post: RE: Bug -o option
| left side is a bit small for so much computing power. maybe shift some masks from the right to the left like ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1 or increase keyspace with -1 ?l?d. also mixing gpus isnt very good. con... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,948 |
09-15-2011, 10:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug -o option
Post: RE: Bug -o option
| you need to add rules when using fast algorithms in combination with plus. for example add -r rules/perfect.rule (its a benchmarking rule). |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,948 |
09-16-2011, 11:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug -o option
Post: RE: Bug -o option
| which version are you using? i remember having that issue in an old version |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,948 |
09-19-2011, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug -o option
Post: RE: Bug -o option
| thanks for the screenshot. i cant see which cpu is it? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,948 |
09-19-2011, 05:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Title Rule
Post: RE: Title Rule
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
22,715 |
09-19-2011, 05:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Title Rule
Post: RE: Title Rule
| such a function does not exist |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
22,715 |
09-19-2011, 10:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Title Rule
Post: RE: Title Rule
| will not implement, sorry. if you think its worth doing it remember you can always pipe from stdin. you just need to code it yourself. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
22,715 |
09-20-2011, 09:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug -o option
Post: RE: Bug -o option
| cant reproduce this locally. please upload all required files somewhere pls. maybe its something in your hashlist. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
16,948 |
09-20-2011, 09:52 AM |
