|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
| hmm ok, have to dig deeper into it. please post the stuff again as a trac ticket |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,181 |
03-31-2013, 12:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: First build, need opinions.
Post: RE: First build, need opinions.
| 2x7870 are around 1.35 times faster than 1x7970, but they produce 350W and the 7970 only 230W TDP |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
9 |
14,591 |
06-20-2013, 03:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: CMIYC 2013
Post: RE: CMIYC 2013
| Hey mastercracker, congrats to your first place! Your writeup is great I enjoyed reading it.
@Kgx: We're still assembling all team-mates writeups |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
21,874 |
08-19-2013, 03:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
Post: RE: New oclhashcat-plus and speed poblems...
| Yes, it's true, it's slower, but not 50%. From my tests single hash MD5 with rule based attacks drop is around 25%
Make sure to read the release notes. You need to prepare your dictionaries |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
17,914 |
09-03-2013, 07:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Post: RE: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
| Depending on the algorithm you use, this speed sounds to low. For example if this is MD5, you should be in den 500M or more range. If thats so, you might have forgotten to add rules as a multiplier. T... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
9 |
21,030 |
09-05-2013, 05:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Post: RE: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
| Try passwordspro.rule. It should be big enough. If you do not get more speed with it than with best64, then you're already running at maximum speed. Also note that rule-based attacks are slower than b... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
9 |
21,030 |
09-06-2013, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: b53
| b53 is up in /beta -- beta tester pls note this version introduced lot of deep memory allocation changes, be very sensible about errors and report soon.
this is especially for windows users |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-14-2013, 03:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| I tried to reproduce #1 but failed.
I expect this to be a cr/lf error somehow. Therefore it's important to have a hexdump from a rulefile that creates that error.
Also, did you use b57?
Pleas... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-26-2013, 11:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| No, b57 includes workarounds to all known bugs in catalyst drivers starting from 13.4
You are free to use any driver you want as long as it is >= 13.4 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-26-2013, 10:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| Excellent, I'm now able to reproduce it.
Will be fixed soon. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-27-2013, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b53
Post: RE: b53
| ok, fixed with beta60 - up in /beta |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
10,594 |
11-27-2013, 10:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| You're missing a space after -m 2500 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Please close the thread if the problem is solved. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Do not use AMD APP SDK if you want to run oclHashcat. Make sure it's not installed. It's the primary source for strange errors on linux. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-13-2013, 06:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brutforce too slow? / Increment-Problems [Solved]
Post: RE: Brutforce too slow? / Increment-Problems [Solv...
| 140 kH/s on 7970 sounds perfect without overclock |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
29,022 |
01-13-2014, 12:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: strange behaviour when using dictionary
Post: RE: strange behaviour when using dictionary
| please upload the .hccap and the .cap somewhere and give us the plaintext so we can try to reproduce |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,658 |
02-16-2014, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: strange behaviour when using dictionary
Post: RE: strange behaviour when using dictionary
| does your plaintext password contain any non-ascii letters, like german umlauts or any language specific letters? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,658 |
02-19-2014, 03:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: strange behaviour when using dictionary
Post: RE: strange behaviour when using dictionary
| maybe its rejected? to short? less than 8 chars? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
14,658 |
02-19-2014, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu134579
Post: RE: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu1345...
| You can also put all characters into a file (all in one line) and then use -1 filename
Should save you headache about the escaping |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,222 |
02-23-2014, 11:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windows
Post: RE: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windo...
| Take a look at the benchmarks: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ to get an idea about the performance relative |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,252 |
03-05-2014, 05:58 PM |
