|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Forum update
Post: RE: Forum update
| I've forced the new CSS and to all users :)
Many thanks to xanadrel ! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
14,686 |
07-08-2015, 09:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ibm security directory server hash
Post: RE: ibm security directory server hash
| Please post the full hash and the plaintext password on trac or by PM to me. If you don't know the plaintext password, generate a new one that you know. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
11,573 |
08-27-2015, 09:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ibm security directory server hash
Post: RE: ibm security directory server hash
| Same, I've also tryed with a decoded the salt and a non-decoded salt. Still there's a good possiblity this is just -m 1410 as ldap server usually work like this. If that's the case then either the has... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
11,573 |
08-28-2015, 01:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) add a rule (important!) and 2) add -w 3 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 11:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I think you're confusing hashcat and oclHashcat here, is that possible? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-28-2016, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-29-2016, 09:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Double SHA1
Post: RE: Double SHA1
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
13,638 |
06-20-2016, 11:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
Post: RE: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
| First, the limit on 31 is not true for all cases, there's ways to support up to 55: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_is_the_maximum_supported_password_length
Any... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
13,637 |
06-23-2016, 11:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
Post: RE: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
| why don't you just use -m 4700 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
13,637 |
06-25-2016, 10:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
Post: RE: SHA1 - Unable to use MD5 as a password
| see here:
Code:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# echo -n test | md5sum
098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6 -
ro... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
13,637 |
06-26-2016, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WinZip in version 3.0
Post: RE: WinZip in version 3.0
| You need to use "zip2john" |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,807 |
07-04-2016, 12:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia fan use issues
Post: RE: Nvidia fan use issues
| The typical reason for that is that you:
1. Did not use XDM, it important for step 2
2. Disable access control to X11, so that hashcat can connect to your X11 session. Read here: https://hashcat.n... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,016 |
07-06-2016, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia fan use issues
Post: RE: Nvidia fan use issues
| That step should not be neccessary with hashcat, it has a build-in enable section for it. Please verify your statement again. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,016 |
07-08-2016, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WinZip in version 3.0
Post: RE: WinZip in version 3.0
| That's the correct one, but make sure not all zip versions are supported. Maybe you run into a zip version that is not supported. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,807 |
07-08-2016, 10:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Building a password cracking machine
Post: RE: Building a password cracking machine
|
Crackattack Wrote: (07-08-2016, 11:20 PM)
--
Yea I'm aware sli isn't the best way, I'm asking how many gpu could you put on a setup like brutalis 8 gpu doesn't sound much
--
You can not do 20 GPU... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
9 |
19,700 |
07-09-2016, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Device local mem size is too small
Post: RE: Device local mem size is too small
| You also need to install the Intel OpenCL SDK |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
12,002 |
07-11-2016, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Device local mem size is too small
Post: RE: Device local mem size is too small
| Long time ago that I've seen this error message. You clearly need to update your driver(s) and OpenCL runtime(s). Not a hashcat problem. See wiki for detailed information |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
12,002 |
07-11-2016, 04:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Device local mem size is too small
Post: RE: Device local mem size is too small
| Remove the kernels folder and try again |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
12,002 |
07-12-2016, 09:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia fan use issues
Post: RE: Nvidia fan use issues
| If you set it even lower, for example "--gpu-temp-retain 10", then it should instantly set the fan speed to 100%. Please try that and what philsmd said. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,016 |
07-14-2016, 12:03 PM |
