|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 6990 today or wait for 7970?
Post: RE: 6990 today or wait for 7970?
| the hd6770 is a nice mid range card |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,278 |
12-18-2011, 01:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.07
| Hello Hashcat-Community,
I am proud to present you the latest oclHashcat-plus v0.07 release.
As you might already know, porting features from regular oclHashcat to oclHashcat-plus was my biggest... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
8 |
29,866 |
12-31-2011, 04:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat Benchmarking
Post: Hashcat Benchmarking
| Hey Guys,
ever wondered how I do the benchmarks shown on the Homepage?
Here you can download the scripts I use for meassuring: https://hashcat.net/misc/benchmark_scripts.rar
But, be warned, t... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
19,308 |
01-18-2012, 07:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Post: RE: Can't get it to crack known hashes
| yeah, looks like your sha1 generator isnt generating valid sha1 results. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,224 |
01-19-2012, 07:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Post: RE: Can't get it to crack known hashes
| root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# echo -n '12345' | sha1sum
8cb2237d0679ca88db6464eac60da96345513964 - |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,224 |
01-19-2012, 06:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Post: RE: Can't get it to crack known hashes
| there is not algorithm implementation difference in linux and windows. thing is, passwords are usually not stored in utf8 / utf16. if you want to crack utf8 passwords you have to use hex-charsets. but... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,224 |
01-19-2012, 10:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can't get it to crack known hashes
Post: RE: Can't get it to crack known hashes
| thats right, hashcat does not support HMAC for sha1 or md5. they are rarely requested. actually you are the first who asks for it. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,224 |
01-20-2012, 12:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
| you are missing the mask itself. maybe read the article again. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-02-2012, 06:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
| with oclHashcat-plus v0.07 there is no more need to use maskprocessor for brute-force. run it in -a 3 mode:
cudahashcat-plus32 -m 500 hash.txt -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-06-2012, 06:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
| your charset consists of 28 characters and you want to do all combinations for length 9. so you have 28^9 = 10578455953408 combinations. no you want to partition this on 4 computer, so you have a chun... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,949 |
02-08-2012, 01:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
| sure, use GPU, use oclHashcat-lite, see benchmarks here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat-lite/ |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,949 |
02-08-2012, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Four Server And One Hash
Post: RE: Four Server And One Hash
|
Esra Wrote: (02-08-2012, 09:53 PM)
--
yes but i get this error : the producers entry point cuCtxCreate_v2 ... and i should update my nvidia drive .
if i use ubuntu for cracking instead of windows ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,949 |
02-09-2012, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
|
TAPE Wrote: (02-11-2012, 04:50 PM)
--
So what I am not clear on is the WIKI mention of using the --bf-pw-min & --bf-pw-max switches for
bruteforce attacks.
Could anyone be so kind as to give an o... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-11-2012, 06:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GPU Cracking Machine
Post: RE: GPU Cracking Machine
| yes it does, see here to get an idea: https://hashcat.net/wiki/distributing_workload_in_oclhashcat |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,268 |
02-19-2012, 10:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: GPU Cracking Machine
Post: RE: GPU Cracking Machine
|
atom |
Hardware
|
8 |
19,268 |
02-20-2012, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: Simple Question
| Hey Guys,
simple question: Do we still need 32bit builds?
--
atom
|
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,455 |
02-21-2012, 01:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,455 |
02-21-2012, 02:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
| there is no speed difference between 32 and 64 bit for the gpu tools, the cpu tool greatly benefits from the 64 bitness. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,455 |
02-21-2012, 08:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
| what about linux security distributions? are they all available as 64 bit? |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,455 |
02-23-2012, 11:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Simple Question
Post: RE: Simple Question
| OK, got several comments on twitter. I will keep the 32 bit versions. Thanks for comments! Thread closed. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
8 |
15,455 |
02-23-2012, 06:06 PM |
