|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking LM
Post: RE: Cracking LM
| works fine for my cayman gpu:
Code:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 3000 0182BD0BD4444BF836077A718CCDF409 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d -a 3
** Valid keyfile for beta usage: atom (... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
33,385 |
05-29-2012, 02:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Substitute more than one character at a time.
Post: RE: Substitute more than one character at a time.
| I still have no idea how I could port it. Its incompatible to VLIW datatypes. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,747 |
06-02-2012, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl-hashcat-plus v0.08 Freezing.
Post: RE: ocl-hashcat-plus v0.08 Freezing.
| Try to reproduce with beta pls |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,446 |
06-05-2012, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ocl-hashcat-plus v0.08 Freezing.
Post: RE: ocl-hashcat-plus v0.08 Freezing.
| This might be the new retain speed feature. It tries to hold the temperature of your GPU at a given temperature (default is 70c). In case temp is above it raises the fan speed by 1% each second. You c... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,446 |
06-05-2012, 12:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cracking LM
Post: RE: Cracking LM
| Well, this LM, so it cant be that serious :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
33,385 |
06-12-2012, 05:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| Beta-Testers,
oclHashcat-lite v0.10 is released soon. Please do some deep checks. All the changes made are as always in docs/changes.
--
atom |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-26-2012, 11:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| OK, there was a huge bug on nvidia. All nvidia users reset to zero and download b92 and try again :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-27-2012, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| RC version (without beta-tag) is in /beta |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-28-2012, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
| GUYS check it out, its in /beta.
Tomorrow is release. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-28-2012, 04:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
|
undeath Wrote: (06-28-2012, 07:54 PM)
--
it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory".... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-28-2012, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon
|
atom Wrote: (06-28-2012, 09:36 PM)
--
undeath Wrote: (06-28-2012, 07:54 PM)
--
it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hash... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,312 |
06-28-2012, 09:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Question: use of SSD
Post: RE: Question: use of SSD
| on window, rolf uses a ram-disc to speed up dictionary loading. but i have no idea if it makes any difference. on linux this is not neccessary since the linux kernel caches is per default. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
12,848 |
06-29-2012, 10:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Question: use of SSD
Post: RE: Question: use of SSD
| I think he is talking about dictionary based attacks. Sure on oclHashcat-lite there will be no difference. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
12,848 |
06-30-2012, 08:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.10 a litle bit slower
Post: RE: 0.10 a litle bit slower
|
KT819GM Wrote: (07-03-2012, 11:30 AM)
--
So try --markov-disable on your command line.
--
This wont help. The speed remain. Speed drop from 0.09 to 0.10 is not caused by word-generator. Its because... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
16,740 |
07-03-2012, 05:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
Post: RE: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
| exactly, its no so easy to implement. as long this state remains, you can still use this workaround: https://hashcat.net/wiki/oclhashcat_plus#resume_support |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
15,875 |
07-24-2012, 09:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
Post: RE: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
| If you amplify stuff with rules you can reach full speed |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
15,875 |
07-25-2012, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashing error
Post: RE: Hashing error
| as radix said, its already supported. please use -m 2611 or -m 2711, depending on salt length |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
12,904 |
08-23-2012, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700
| It could be the pcie slot as well. I would double check this by swapping cards around. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,420 |
09-08-2012, 05:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700
Post: RE: ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700
| I am using a 560Ti for development, too, and its not happening. You can try -n 1 --gpu-loops 1 and then increase till it occours. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,420 |
09-08-2012, 10:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
Post: RE: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
| If this is about keyboard-walks, why dont you just use a keyboard walk generator and pipe it to stdin? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
21,142 |
09-29-2012, 03:07 PM |
