|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
Post: RE: Crash Recovery Mechanism Implementation
| Resume / Restore support added to latest oclHashcat-plus version. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
15,875 |
01-02-2013, 12:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| Something is strange with that reports. See when I tried to execute your cmd I get:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/oclHashcat# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --session=three -a 3 -m 0 -1 '?d?u?l?s?h?D?F?R' g2 '?1'
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-04-2013, 11:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK cool, I can reproduce with this:
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 -n 800 --remove -m 2811 uncracked.txt -o cracked.txt -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u?h?F?R?D
Looks not to complicated. Thanks for report... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 01:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK, code fixed. This bug was in the shared code so it is inside oclHashcat-lite as well.
@ Beta tester please confirm if its fixed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: RE: --remove not working correctly?
| Can you please pack all the files required for reproduce and send me? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,437 |
01-15-2013, 12:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: understanding "Time.Estimated" in oclHashcat-plus "status" output
Post: RE: understanding "Time.Estimated" in oclHashcat-p...
| Yeah, its about 36740146/36738605 - which is not possible and usually happens after restore |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
15,077 |
01-15-2013, 01:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: RE: --remove not working correctly?
| Yeah, very likely. Didnt had the time yet to look into it. Thanks for the files! |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,437 |
01-16-2013, 06:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: b10 hardcore change
| Starting with b10, I did some hardcore changes to the core about the thread handling, initially caused by TT #9.
If something works strange, do not hesitate - post it! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-24-2013, 06:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| can not reproduce. anyone? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-25-2013, 11:54 AM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| guys please check out b13 is fixed some major bugs. i hope the reported issue from craiu is fixed as well. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-25-2013, 10:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| b15 changed even more bugs, i strongly recommend updating. also added sm_35 and password safe and half md5 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-27-2013, 09:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: b10 hardcore change
Post: RE: b10 hardcore change
| no it wont work with 12.8 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
8 |
8,553 |
01-28-2013, 06:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: --remove not working correctly?
Post: RE: --remove not working correctly?
| did you sort -u your hashlist before? at this time there is -no- known error for --remove |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
13,437 |
02-09-2013, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
| Maybe, but there is no updated SDK available. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,002 |
03-01-2013, 10:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cap2hccap — it's malware...
Post: RE: cap2hccap — it's malware...
| What makes you think it is manipulating memory and Norton signatures? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,855 |
04-22-2013, 09:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: All Chars = Big Chaos
Post: RE: All Chars = Big Chaos
| Yes, this is a common technique. Some websites use CR as salt which leads to all kind of confusing results. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
14,743 |
05-02-2013, 11:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How can I get status from hashcat for using other program?
Post: RE: How can I get status from hashcat for using ot...
| its not recommended to read status via the stdout console. better read the .restore file (and reread it to update). the binary structure is documented in the wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
16,012 |
05-13-2013, 11:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: All Chars = Big Chaos
Post: RE: All Chars = Big Chaos
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
14,743 |
05-13-2013, 11:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How can I get status from hashcat for using other program?
Post: RE: How can I get status from hashcat for using ot...
| the speed can be calculated by the change between the current position and the time difference. api might be an idea, but lower prio |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
16,012 |
05-13-2013, 08:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Help me get the result, please.
Post: RE: Help me get the result, please.
| I can confirm, cracked in a few seconds with hashcat cpu :) |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,133 |
06-21-2013, 06:24 AM |
