Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Help with long salt
Post: RE: Help with long salt
That's currently not supported, sorry. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
17,681 |
03-11-2014, 07:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: cuStreamSync errors with OS X 10.8 hash
Post: RE: cuStreamSync errors with OS X 10.8 hash
The OSX 10.8 algorithm is a pain. It is doing lots of iterations that keep your GPU busy. The driver therefore often alarms out, especially with slower cards because the entire calculation takes more ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
17,426 |
05-30-2014, 09:42 AM |
|
|
Thread: Hashing a dic and adding it to POT
Post: RE: Hashing a dic and adding it to POT
well, for salted hashes you lack the salt, so it won't work here.
for unsalted hashes i think there will be some point where it's faster to crack them.
but for unsalted hashes, you should use ra... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
12,946 |
07-21-2014, 03:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: What kind of hash is this?
Post: RE: What kind of hash is this?
can be anything. you will need to reverse engineer the algorithm used |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
16,902 |
09-22-2014, 11:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
1.32 uses AMP kernel (candidates calculated on GPU), therefore you need bigger wordlists as with 1.31. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,762 |
02-16-2015, 01:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Post: RE: WPA speed problem comparing to v1.31
Well you can. If you really want to use small wordlists as before (and then adding rules), you can use hashcat in --stdout mode and pipe it to oclHashcat. In that case you will get the same speed with... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,762 |
02-18-2015, 05:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hash Prestashop
Post: RE: Hash Prestashop
It's good you've add the plaintext of the password, otherwise you'd have been banned now :)
To your question, yes it's the salt length. I've never heard before of Prestashop, is it popular? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
18,706 |
02-22-2015, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hash Prestashop
Post: RE: Hash Prestashop
no you can not do that as md5 works blockwise. you have to do a new round of transformation for each 64 bytes (and the last one only 55 bytes). therefore it requires a new kernel |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
18,706 |
02-24-2015, 12:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33
Sounds good for me (with v1.33). 136302297088 / 83355000 = 27 mins |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,910 |
02-26-2015, 11:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,910 |
02-28-2015, 05:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Post: RE: oclHashcat v1.33 speed drop
Here's the log that I had with undeath, it explains it in detail:
Quote:
--
18:28:25 undeath | atom: it really seems something messed up from 1.31 to 1.32, cudaExample0 is almost twice as slow
1... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,910 |
02-26-2015, 08:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
clCreateBuffer() -61 basically means "Out of Memory". That means your GPU memory. The number of hashes (plus the fact that they are salted) affects the required memory plus the wordload profile affect... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,312 |
03-03-2015, 02:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
It's as i said, the wordload profile affects the required memory, too. In your above example you used -w 3 with 1.33 and -w 2 with 1.31. That makes no sense unless you test 1.33 with -w 2 as well |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,312 |
03-05-2015, 12:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
I took my oldest card I have, a hd5770, and I tried to reproduce the problem. That card has only 256mb of GPU ram.
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/xy/oclHashcat-1.33# ./oclHashcat64.bin -a 3 -m 2711 -w 3 -... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,312 |
03-08-2015, 01:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: No output file
Post: RE: No output file
The syntax of your commandline is OK plus you cracked many hashes, for sure there's a file called crackedhashes.txt |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,707 |
04-14-2015, 05:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Special characters in mask
Post: RE: Special characters in mask
from illcare's description in the first place we can assume the problem is with spaces, so royce answer is correct.
PS: instead of escape with ^ you can also simply quote a mask, for example "?l?l... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,345 |
04-15-2015, 11:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash
Do you know the password? Is it 8 lowercase letters?
Also there's an error in your commandline: It says ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?1 but maybe you want ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
12,523 |
04-15-2015, 12:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: Truecrypt keyfile support ?
Post: RE: Truecrypt keyfile support ?
There has not been a single request for this in years |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,810 |
04-19-2015, 02:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
I'm testing with the following system:
Quote:
--
Device #1: GeForce GTX 980, 4095MB, 1215Mhz, 16MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2047MB, 1110Mhz, 5MCU
Device #3: GeForce GTX 560 Ti, 1023MB, ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Btw, my gutfeeling tells me this could be maybe somehow related to password length (and rejection). Try with a wordlist where no word has the length > 8 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:59 PM |