|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies
[asc]
|
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
| I've changed rejection handling for v1.36 as it was with v1.31. It's clearly superior. You should test with latest beta version |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-22-2015, 12:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Odd Bruteforce Issue
Post: RE: Odd Bruteforce Issue
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,501 |
04-24-2015, 01:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: nVidia GForce 8300 GS not supported
Post: RE: nVidia GForce 8300 GS not supported
| You can download older versions, see on the oclHashcat page on the bottom for download links. There's even older versions on that folder, till version 1.20, which is not listed. Just replace the filen... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
8 |
15,813 |
04-24-2015, 01:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash
| you can slightly increase the performance using -w 3 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
12,523 |
04-29-2015, 03:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Best card for Descrypt and md5apr1
Post: RE: Best card for Descrypt and md5apr1
| If descrypt is really important for you, you better go AMD. The 290x is still the fastest card to crack descrypt hashes. A stock clocked 290x is faster than a +220Mhz overclocked Titan X.
But note,... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,869 |
06-15-2015, 07:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Fiji Kernel Error
Post: RE: Fiji Kernel Error
| Damn it, this could have been fixed so easy. If you'd reported it a few days before I've added it for 1.37 support. Now you need to wait for 1.38 :( |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,278 |
08-20-2015, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Fiji Kernel Error
Post: RE: Fiji Kernel Error
| No as I said, it's very simple. I just had to add it to the list of supported devices which is only 1 line added :) |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,278 |
08-23-2015, 12:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hash format for 1password 3.7.2
Post: RE: hash format for 1password 3.7.2
| You can't use raw PBKDF2 modes here, there's some AES128 stuff to be done afterwards. You must stick to -m 6600 mode |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,819 |
11-02-2015, 02:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hash format for 1password 3.7.2
Post: RE: hash format for 1password 3.7.2
| https://www.rurapenthe.me/2013/04/cracking-1password-master-password-it.html |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
14,819 |
11-02-2015, 09:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: clEnqueueWriteBuffer() -4 error when using more than 2 rule files
Post: RE: clEnqueueWriteBuffer() -4 error when using mor...
| > Combination of 2 big rule files (+500kb)
Not wondering |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,389 |
03-10-2016, 08:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: clEnqueueWriteBuffer() -4 error when using more than 2 rule files
Post: RE: clEnqueueWriteBuffer() -4 error when using mor...
| No, but they are pure text files. you can simply copy the content of all the rules you want to run at once into a single new file. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
10,389 |
04-02-2016, 02:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
| If you run the same command twice and unless you use --potfile-disable or something that disables the use of the potfile, the second command will not crack the same hashes again. That didn't change.
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
11,439 |
07-05-2016, 08:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
| Indeed looks like a bug in potfile handling. WPA has a special subsection for it. Need to look into that. Please post a GitHub issue for it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
11,439 |
07-06-2016, 09:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
Post: RE: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
| You're attacking bcrypt, what do you expect? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,387 |
07-11-2016, 11:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
Post: RE: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
| Wait, bcrypt have different settings of iterations. Maybe you're trying to crack a bcrypt with a higher iteration than the hash you tried to crack before. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,387 |
07-11-2016, 04:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
Post: RE: Hashcat 3 (from git) and OSX
| It's a known bug in Apples OpenCL runtime. We can't do anything on it |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,387 |
07-13-2016, 06:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
Post: RE: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
| Here's the md5sum of it: 1090d12545fd444f0a70d617d69a4d50
Try to crack it the same way. If it works, your handshake is broken |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,311 |
08-24-2016, 07:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
Post: RE: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
| What's strange here is that you get this line:
Quote:
--
Rejected.......: 1/1 (100.00%)
--
That's why it's not cracking. But that shouldn't occur if the content is "Password", because Passwo... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,311 |
08-27-2016, 10:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
Post: RE: Custom Ruleset, Correct word but exhausted
| As I said, it's about your wordlist. The GPU model doesn't matter. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,311 |
08-28-2016, 10:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Proper way of using --restore
Post: RE: Proper way of using --restore
| Yes, it doesn't make any sense then anyway, because such a small wordlist will finish soon |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,382 |
09-12-2016, 12:12 AM |
