|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up (Y U JOIN MY POSTS?!)
|
M@LIK Wrote: (09-03-2012, 03:48 PM)
--
Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09b70.
Starting with previous bugs:
-m3100: Fixed! Great job as always!
-m3000:
.... -a0: This i... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,868 |
09-03-2012, 08:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| Morning Guys!
b74 is up!
@mastercracker: i guess all passwords were found, right?
@blandy: pls update performance graph
@malik: pls update performance table
@malik: will try -m 3000 anomalies later
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,868 |
09-04-2012, 10:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: A Few Questions:
Post: RE: A Few Questions:
| oclHashcat-plus will support up to 128 GPU with next release. you can cluster them using VCL, but that works only on Linux. crossfire should stay disabled when it comes to cracking. Both oclHashcat-* ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
19 |
34,693 |
09-04-2012, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Some questions on charsets
Post: RE: Some questions on charsets
| If hashcat reports the mask is to big it is usually saving you from starting an attack that would take longer than you life :) |
|
atom |
General Help
|
11 |
35,470 |
09-04-2012, 10:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
|
Rolf Wrote: (09-04-2012, 11:22 AM)
--
Nope, the latest NV WHQL drivers for Windooze are 301.42.
--
what does that mean? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,868 |
09-04-2012, 11:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
| b75 is up!
@mastercracker: i guess all passwords were found, right?
@Rolf : whats the problem with NV WHQL drivers for Windooze are 301.42?
@malik: pls update performance table
@malik: will try -m 30... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,868 |
09-04-2012, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
|
Rolf Wrote: (09-04-2012, 01:39 PM)
--
If you release it, then windows users will need to install beta drivers to use pluscat, which kinda suck.
--
OK, but better this way than to distribute oclHash... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,868 |
09-04-2012, 02:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
Post: RE: Limiting the consecutive occurrence
| thanks for replying. this is an old thread, i will close it now.
the solution has been made already, see here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1291.html |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
125 |
250,822 |
09-04-2012, 02:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Some questions on charsets
Post: RE: Some questions on charsets
|
atom |
General Help
|
11 |
35,470 |
09-04-2012, 06:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: gpu utilization
Post: RE: gpu utilization
| As I already said, you are using the default mask. Please read the mask attack wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
10 |
24,271 |
09-04-2012, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 16 character password + Hybrid Attack
Post: RE: 16 character password + Hybrid Attack
| 1. oclHashcat-plus is limited to 15 chars.
2. hybrid is the wrong attack, you want to do a mask attack. Consolut the wiki again.
3. If you only need to iterated through 8 chars 0-F this is a 16^8 ke... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,936 |
09-04-2012, 07:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Some questions on charsets
Post: RE: Some questions on charsets
| Well thats clear, it thinks F:\RealWordlists\SHA1\Cracked.txt is you mask because you forgot to add -o to your commandline |
|
atom |
General Help
|
11 |
35,470 |
09-04-2012, 07:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
| Hey Beta-testers,
after all the bugfixing its time for the 1st (and hopefully the only one) release candidate for oclHashcat-plus v0.09.
The last beta version before RC1 was b75.
There will ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-04-2012, 08:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
blandyuk Wrote: (09-04-2012, 09:03 PM)
--
Updated graph attached with v0.09rc1
--
Thanks! Can I add them to release notes?
https://hashcat.net/misc/plus89_mh18.png
https://hashcat.net/misc/plus... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-04-2012, 09:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 3 questions..
Post: RE: 3 questions..
| well........ because nvidia sucks for hash cracking
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison
https://www.golubev.com/gpuest.htm
https://www.gat3way.eu/est.php |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
29,066 |
09-04-2012, 10:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
kartan Wrote: (09-04-2012, 09:16 PM)
--
I found some typos in the help. Well, you might argue if these are typos or not but i think they all should have their first char be uppercase to be conform wi... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
blandyuk Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:03 AM)
--
Go ahead, although I now use 1 5870 and 1 5850 now :) will have 3 x 5870s soon and will look at upgrading more after that.
--
Will update that info, thanks! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
M@LIK Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:37 AM)
--
Just a few notes before we dive into the hardcore stuff:
docs\user_manuals.txt(line_3) is old enough to be removed, or just tag it with "Outdated".
--help(line... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
|
forumhero Wrote: (09-05-2012, 12:02 AM)
--
regarding the chart, how about a bar graph? i think it better emphasize an increase in performance, rather than a line graph that's sloping downwards...
--
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
24 |
22,634 |
09-05-2012, 10:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
Post: RE: md5(salt.pass) troubles and tricks
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
20 |
40,866 |
09-05-2012, 10:27 AM |
