|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New Hashing Algorithm Request
Post: RE: New Hashing Algorithm Request
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,169 |
10-01-2012, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: sha512crypt hash error
Post: RE: sha512crypt hash error
| Thats simply wrong. If you do not quote with single ' the shell will interpret $ as shell variable. So you need to either use a file for use ' instead of ". |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
24,508 |
10-01-2012, 09:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat-plus 0.09 ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700 / 999
Post: RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0.09 ERROR: cuStreamSynchroni...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
21,454 |
10-04-2012, 01:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What is the Best way to recover a MyBB pass
Post: RE: What is the Best way to recover a MyBB pass
|
Quote:
--
So this is what happens:
md5(md5($salt).$password)
--
The comment above says $password is the md5'ed password, not the plaintext-password. This makes much more sense, since it means ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
53,090 |
10-04-2012, 01:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Catalyst Control Center: really needed to be installed ?
Post: RE: Catalyst Control Center: really needed to be i...
| Beta did not change anything to this. I am sure you fixed it due to experiments with the drivers, which is known as the cause for adl_overdriver5_temperature_get error. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,634 |
10-04-2012, 01:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
Post: RE: ERROR: cuModuleLoad() 209 again
| cuModuleLoad() 209 is totally different to cuModuleLoad() 301
thread stealer? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
71,487 |
10-04-2012, 01:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: permission denied in hybrid mode
Post: RE: permission denied in hybrid mode
| Hybrid mode does not support folders |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
11,335 |
10-05-2012, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: See what oclHashcat-plus was doing
Post: RE: --pw-min=NUM and --pw-max=NUM?
| Thats not true any longer, oclHashcat-plus got increment mode as well. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,201 |
10-05-2012, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: cudaHashcat-plus 0.09 ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 700 / 999
Post: RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0.09 ERROR: cuStreamSynchroni...
|
koulikov Wrote: (10-04-2012, 05:06 PM)
--
I have compil other open source cuda md5 cracker with last nvidia SDK and there is no problem so I guess there is something wrong in hashcat code.
--
How c... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
21,454 |
10-05-2012, 11:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-0.42b1
Post: RE: hashcat-0.42b1
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,665 |
10-05-2012, 06:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Adding the euro and yen currency in symbols
Post: RE: Adding the euro and yen currency in symbols
| This wont work, since these symbols are multibyte characters. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
11,233 |
10-08-2012, 10:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom charset ?1
Post: RE: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom ...
| I can confirm this bug, thanks! |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,013 |
10-08-2012, 10:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom charset ?1
Post: RE: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom ...
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,013 |
10-08-2012, 10:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: See what oclHashcat-plus was doing 2
Post: RE: --pw-min=NUM and --pw-max=NUM?
| Sorry, not possible for oclHashcat |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,084 |
10-08-2012, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceInfo() -30
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceInfo() -30
| Thanks for the hint, but oclHashcat uses size_t.
Here is a quote from the headers:
void hc_clGetDeviceInfo (cl_device_id device, cl_device_info param_name, size_t param_value_size, void *param_valu... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
9,167 |
10-08-2012, 10:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: shadow file
Post: RE: shadow file
| You dont need to convert, you can take it as it is. Do not forget to add -m 1800 (which oclHashcat-lite does not support) |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
7,511 |
10-08-2012, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No device marked hashcat 0.09
Post: RE: No device marked hashcat 0.09
| Never saw this error in the past. Hardware defect? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
8,511 |
10-08-2012, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09
|
pamamolf Wrote: (10-08-2012, 04:44 PM)
--
Does v0.09 support the Asus HD7970 card?
Thank you
--
yes |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
21 |
94,670 |
10-08-2012, 04:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-lite + AMD 7970 Not Work!
Post: RE: hashcat-lite + AMD 7970 Not Work!
| Didnt AMD drop OpenCL support for AMD? You might have to switch to Windows 7, just an idea, no guarantee. Also 32 bit is totally outdated. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,723 |
10-10-2012, 10:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-lite 0.8+ AMD 7970 Work?
Post: RE: hashcat-lite 0.8+ AMD 7970 Work?
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
8,948 |
10-10-2012, 10:41 AM |
