Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Segmentation fault (core dumped) maybe an exploit
Post: RE: Segmentation fault (core dumped) maybe an expl...
Its a null-pointer derefence, no need to worry. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,010 |
12-22-2012, 11:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Same command, different output?
Post: RE: Same command, different output?
Can you upload the hashlist and the dictionary somewhere so that we can try to reproduce this? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
21 |
41,752 |
12-23-2012, 02:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash in .pot file
Post: RE: hashcat 0.41 putting something other than hash...
OK, can reproduce this. Thanks for posting. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,440 |
12-23-2012, 02:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: How to configure mask attack
Post: RE: How to configure mask attack
This is simply not possible because of the salt (ESSID) that is used by WPA/WPA2. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
16,696 |
12-23-2012, 02:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: add MSCHAPV2 support
Post: RE: add MSCHAPV2 support
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,946 |
12-23-2012, 02:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: add MSCHAPV2 support
Post: RE: add MSCHAPV2 support
Oh wait, that already exist! |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
14,946 |
12-23-2012, 02:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat-plus and "not found passwords"
Post: RE: Hashcat-plus and "not found passwords"
driver/oclhashcat incompatibility problem |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,186 |
12-23-2012, 02:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Bug using markov chains?
Post: RE: Bug using markov chains?
can you try -t instead of --markov-threshold please? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
12,276 |
12-23-2012, 02:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: vcl woes
Post: RE: vcl woes
Right, I already remove it from beta. Next release version will not ship it any longer. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
37 |
57,187 |
12-23-2012, 02:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: cudaHashcat problem with nVidia card
Post: RE: cudaHashcat problem with nVidia card
Try -n 1, if it works, -n 2, then -n 4 and so on till it wont work anymore |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,193 |
12-30-2012, 11:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: Hashcat hash limit: 24 M or more ?
Post: RE: Hashcat hash limit: 24 M or more ?
No, its just a number and should work. Also with latest beta, memory requirements are lower. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,130 |
12-30-2012, 11:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: HD3400 support?
Post: RE: HD3400 support?
No, AMD never added support for OpenCL to 3xxx series. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,003 |
12-30-2012, 11:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat without window manager
Post: RE: oclHashcat without window manager
The main problem is that all drivers > catalyst 12.8 are very unstable (and slow). So you should stick to catalyst 12.8. Btw, X11 is not decreasing your cracking rates. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
12,783 |
12-30-2012, 11:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: cudaHashcat problem with nVidia card
Post: RE: cudaHashcat problem with nVidia card
hmm ok try --gpu-loops 1 -n 1. If that doesnt work, you card simply sucks :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,193 |
12-31-2012, 11:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: 0.42b5: The rule Q
Post: RE: 0.42b5: The rule Q
The description of Q is:
query the memory and reject the word unless it has changed
So yeah, you are right. I will fix this. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,299 |
12-31-2012, 11:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
I do have a v0.10 beta ready for release. The problem why I dont do is more because of the catalyst driver. If I do a release, it will be for catalyst 12.8 which is very old now. But all the later one... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
I am preparing for release, give me a few hours |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
[hr]
I have decided to do a dual-release of both oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11.
That is because both programs share many of the changes that have been done in the last months.
The... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
12-31-2012, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
*** UPDATED ***
Both tools, oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus were in beta mode. Beta versions require a keyfile, release version do not.
oclHashcat-plus has been updated to v0.11.
oclHashcat-lit... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
12-31-2012, 05:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
Had to update again since the linux binaries still were in beta mode (windows versions were not). Otherwise its getting confused in the next days when bugreports come in.
Thanks Guys! |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
12-31-2012, 09:58 PM |