|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: cuMemAlloc () 2
Post: RE: cuMemAlloc () 2
| You surely have not the same error, since cuMemAlloc() 2 is specific to NVidia cards. And you have AMD. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
7 |
17,209 |
10-07-2013, 11:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
Post: RE: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
| descrypt speed depends on catalyst version, not oclHashcat-plus version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,055 |
10-07-2013, 12:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| OK, so is the first problem solved?
Now, the second one, it's not a oclHashcat-plus problem. See here, from https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat_catalyst_forceware:
Quote:
--
There ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-07-2013, 12:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Slow performance on traditional des
Post: RE: Slow performance on traditional des
| Thats very good for the first card, but not for the 2nd. Looks like GPU bios clocked it down due to heat. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,849 |
10-07-2013, 12:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which one (hashcat/oclhashcat-plus/lite) for which algorithm?
Post: RE: Which one (hashcat/oclhashcat-plus/lite) for w...
| The -s and -l flags will be gone after the fusion, but maybe come back sooner or later OR with an external tool to create fake .restore files that can do the same. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
14,790 |
10-09-2013, 09:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 0.15 and problems
Post: RE: 0.15 and problems
| If you think you found a bug, please post it on TRAC including all information how to reproduce. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
26 |
43,866 |
10-09-2013, 09:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| No, cudaHashcat* uses the driver API, which is completly different to the CUDA runtime |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-10-2013, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.15
| Ignore it, oclHashcat-lite will be merged into oclHashcat v1.00 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Announcements
|
1 |
14,720 |
10-10-2013, 10:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: snucl
Post: RE: snucl
| I've splittet the thread.
Anyone ever tried that snucl thing? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,914 |
10-15-2013, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| I usually do not like to talk about why is hashcat not open source, because people are very stubborn when it comes to this question. There are 1000 arguments for and against open source (or closed sou... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,494 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why closed source?
Post: RE: Why closed source?
| Oh and btw, hashcat is not a fork of JtR. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
29 |
65,494 |
10-12-2013, 09:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Session issue
Post: RE: Session issue
| remember that the .restore file is written only at specific times. it might not be an issue, you maybe stopped to early and it did not had a chance to write the file. especially when you increase the ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
18,653 |
10-15-2013, 04:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat-plus v0.15
| also note, rule-files are not supported in -a 1 mode. so actually that would be two feature requests. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
2 |
18,839 |
10-15-2013, 04:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat distributed WPA2
Post: RE: oclHashcat distributed WPA2
| oclHashcat-plus works different than oclHashcat-lite. There are two major difference in oclhashcat-plus that you do not have with oclHashcat-lite:
- oclHashcat-lite has a known keyspace when the pr... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
7,106 |
10-15-2013, 04:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can Oclhashcat Open Interface to developers?
Post: RE: Can Oclhashcat Open Interface to developers?
| I don't like that idea.
- There could be 3rd party developers that would start writing support for kernels but only for selling them. This could create a situation that people start thinking the "i... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,665 |
10-15-2013, 05:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
Post: RE: Cat 13.11b1 (linux)
| lol, try -b --benchmark-mode 1
we may need to lower -n and/or -u for the slow algorithms, too |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
5,554 |
10-15-2013, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5(unix) performance
Post: RE: MD5(unix) performance
|
mrfurious Wrote: (10-13-2013, 02:51 PM)
--
Is the unix version doing many iterations?
--
right, md5crypt is doing 1000 iterations of md5. but theres also some sort of obfuscation build into it, so ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,762 |
10-15-2013, 05:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: RIPv2
Post: RE: RIPv2
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,442 |
10-15-2013, 05:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.1...
| No it's as I said, the driver API is completly different to the CUDA runtime |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
10-15-2013, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-lite-0.15 crash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-lite-0.15 crash
| Are you using --benchmark-mode 1? This should create 99% utilization. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
15,377 |
10-15-2013, 05:08 PM |
