|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
Post: RE: 2x Nvidia TESLA K80 Benchmark
| If oclHashcat shows 0H/s this is typically the case when a user is running an attack on a slow hash types. If the time it takes to calculate a full batch of OpenCL-workitems is greater than SPEED_MAXA... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
5 |
9,534 |
04-13-2016, 09:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
Post: RE: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
| 15081984 iterations, wth!!
It's simply slower than 1H/s |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,813 |
04-10-2016, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
Post: RE: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
| Yeah, that's right. It's actually faster than 0H/s. Showing 0H/s is not the true speed. The best way to find out is to comment out this line:
Quote:
--
if (rec_ms > SPEED_MAXAGE) continue;
--
and... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,813 |
04-10-2016, 03:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Not sure how to crack a chained SHA-256 hash
Post: RE: Not sure how to crack a chained SHA-256 hash
| there's no way to do that with the existing kernels, but since we went OSS you can hack one of them to do what you like. I'd recommend kernel source of -m 1400 as a template |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,300 |
04-18-2016, 05:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TC password found, wrong?
Post: RE: TC password found, wrong?
| Please send me the first 512 byte and the incorrect password so that we can reproduce and fix the problem |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
15,462 |
04-18-2016, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TC password found, wrong?
Post: RE: TC password found, wrong?
| Thanks for the file you've provided. I've analyzed it.
The first thing I tried to reproduce is why JtR isn't cracking it. It turns out the reason is that JtR doesn't support boot-mode TC cracking. ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
15,462 |
04-20-2016, 02:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| The most important question is, does the new OSS driver support OpenCL.
At this point, radeon-crimson-15.12-15.302-151217a-297685e.zip is the best driver you can get for oclHashcat on linux.
But... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 11:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| I've updated one of my development systems to Ubuntu 16.04 to clarify the situation.
As you can read about almost everywhere, fglrx is no longer supported. That's mostly because X11 is not compatib... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| But no one yet seems to have found out how to do it, even there's alot of discussion going on about this topic. It's like some hidden mysterium. A pretty demoralizing argument is this:
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Your doing 2 things wrong!
Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_is_my_attack_so_slow Point 2 and 3
Basically 1) add a rule (important!) and 2) add -w 3 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 10:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| Not sure what your problem is, 105MH/s is pretty good for a CPU. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-27-2016, 11:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with the "add wordlist" button
Post: RE: Problem with the "add wordlist" button
| GUI not supported here, please ask on authors site |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
4,280 |
04-27-2016, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
| I think you're confusing hashcat and oclHashcat here, is that possible? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-28-2016, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-29-2016, 09:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat beta and ubuntu 16.04 summary
Post: hashcat beta and ubuntu 16.04 summary
| There have been many issues reported when installing Ubuntu 16.04 and the latest beta (which is also the future release).
I've installed it myself to see what's going on.
Here we go:
Make ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
19,539 |
04-30-2016, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do I need to do pipes for my GPU cracking?
Post: RE: Do I need to do pipes for my GPU cracking?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,714 |
05-01-2016, 09:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: bypass hashcat
Post: RE: bypass hashcat
| https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#why_should_i_use_a_mask_attack_i_just_want_to_brute_these_hashes |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
11,462 |
05-01-2016, 09:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: cudahascat bug?
Post: RE: cudahascat bug?
| Already fixed in latest beta, thanks! |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
4,886 |
05-03-2016, 05:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
Post: RE: Breaking Samsung Android Passwords/PIN
| The optimal maskfile, according to the policy you've posted, would be:
Quote:
--
?u?l?l?l
?l?u?l?l
?l?l?u?l
?l?l?l?u
--
You can generate them with PACK 0.4 |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
47 |
208,555 |
05-04-2016, 12:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Behind the WinZip KDF optimization
Post: Behind the WinZip KDF optimization
| With the latest beta-version of hashcat I've added support to crack WinZip encrypted (password protected) archives.
While I was implementing the kernel it turned out that their use of PBKDF2 (aka... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
1 |
13,478 |
05-13-2016, 01:32 PM |
