|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
| If you run the same command twice and unless you use --potfile-disable or something that disables the use of the potfile, the second command will not crack the same hashes again. That didn't change.
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
11,439 |
07-05-2016, 08:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How To: Hashcat 3.0 on a 32-bit Linux VM
Post: RE: How To: Hashcat 3.0 on a 32-bit Linux VM
| Thanks! About that one error, you should post it to the pocl project. They are pretty good and fast in fixing their own bugs, if it is. Also possible it's a LLVM problem. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
16,920 |
07-05-2016, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Any need for dummy plugs
Post: RE: Any need for dummy plugs
|
Quote:
--
Are these plugs needed for headless setup?
--
Not sure about Windows, but for sure not on Linux.
Quote:
--
I also noticed HC3.0 supports a new headless profile but I assumed thi... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,920 |
07-05-2016, 08:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [Benchmark] MSI GTX 1080 FE
Post: RE: Bench : MSI GTX 1080 FE
| +200Mhz should be no problem |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
5 |
7,835 |
07-05-2016, 08:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3.00 + nvidia cpu load
Post: RE: hashcat v3.00 + nvidia cpu load
| No that's not related. I've tested with the latest 368 drivers, it's still buggy. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,702 |
07-05-2016, 08:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
Post: RE: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
| In DES, for decrypt, you just access the sboxes in reverse. See https://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/uclibc/libcrypt/des.c how it handles de_keysl[] and en_keysl[] |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,457 |
07-05-2016, 08:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
|
Quote:
--
- pure bruteforcing : v3.00 is faster
- Straight wordlist (no rules) : v3.00 is faster
--
yes
Quote:
--
- wordists + rules : v2.01 is faster BUT buggy
--
yes, but only for ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
07-06-2016, 08:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
| oclHashcat v2.01 is outdated. Please use hashcat v3.00 |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
7 |
10,573 |
07-06-2016, 09:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do the tools all still apply to hashcat3?
Post: RE: Do the tools all still apply to hashcat3?
| We need to update some of the wiki pages for hashcat, that's right. Some of them make no sense in the shed of hashcat v3.00, but they will still work. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,695 |
07-06-2016, 09:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Post: RE: dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
| Your CPU is so slow because you are using the AMD driver. For optimal CPU performance with Intel CPUs you need the Intel OpenCL SDK. Capeverde is your GPU. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,613 |
07-06-2016, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
Post: RE: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
| I've explained that in detail in the hashcat v3.00 release notes. If you don't work on the system -w 3 is fine. With -w 3 it should be ~96ms, but that's possible only with enough amplifiers. With stra... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,303 |
07-06-2016, 09:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v3 macOS
Post: RE: hashcat v3 macOS
| I don't have an OSX compiler. OSX user please compile from sources. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
15 |
29,357 |
07-06-2016, 09:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
Post: RE: hashcat-3.00 - potfile behavior / ignored ?
| Indeed looks like a bug in potfile handling. WPA has a special subsection for it. Need to look into that. Please post a GitHub issue for it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
11,439 |
07-06-2016, 09:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia fan use issues
Post: RE: Nvidia fan use issues
| The typical reason for that is that you:
1. Did not use XDM, it important for step 2
2. Disable access control to X11, so that hashcat can connect to your X11 session. Read here: https://hashcat.n... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,016 |
07-06-2016, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Post: RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
| Please stick to 7bit characters for the pathname, it will save you a lot of headache. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,613 |
07-06-2016, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: crunch >>hashcat>>aircrack ??
Post: RE: crunch >>hashcat>>aircrack ??
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,599 |
07-08-2016, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
Post: RE: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
| You will not be able to do anything on the desktop. I'd still recommend -w 3, it has several advantages |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,303 |
07-08-2016, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Nvidia fan use issues
Post: RE: Nvidia fan use issues
| That step should not be neccessary with hashcat, it has a build-in enable section for it. Please verify your statement again. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,016 |
07-08-2016, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: FPGA is that any good?
Post: RE: FPGA is that any good?
| We don't have enough experience with it. Support for all OpenCL devices types just started with hashcat v3.00. Also we don't have any hardware to test on. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
10,259 |
07-08-2016, 10:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WinZip in version 3.0
Post: RE: WinZip in version 3.0
| That's the correct one, but make sure not all zip versions are supported. Maybe you run into a zip version that is not supported. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
11,807 |
07-08-2016, 10:11 AM |
