|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
|
vector Wrote:
--
Can I request plain dictionary attack for oclHashcat I think this is very useful future especially for the salted hashes ?
--
it depends. if we are talking about plain MD5/SHA1 (sa... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,398 |
05-17-2010, 11:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Divide the workload to multiple computers
Post: RE: Divide the workload to multiple computers
|
richardsguy Wrote: (05-17-2010, 04:44 AM)
--
How about a way to divide the workload to multiple computers so that if something takes 10 days to do, then it will reduce the time by 3 fold. Something ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
8,825 |
05-17-2010, 11:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
| The 2nd core of the hd5970 is only supported on linux (by using a undocumented variable). Officially the 2nd core of the hd5970 is not supported by OpenCL :-( As a workaround you can use the -d 1 swit... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,325 |
01-23-2011, 06:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat-utils
Post: RE: hashcat-utils
| yes it is: https://hashcat.net/files/hashcat-utils-0.2.rar |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
4 |
12,068 |
01-23-2011, 06:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
| my hd5970 in multihash mode makes ~3800M/s on two hashes and 2900M/s on 6500 hashes. so your paste is showing a hd5970 with both cores running.
for a good performance check use this command: oclHashc... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,325 |
01-24-2011, 02:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Incremental commamnd
Post: RE: Incremental commamnd
|
zeealpal Wrote:
--
Heyy i have a couple of questions... What command if possible would i use to make oclHashcat start at an incremental a-z and 0-9 up to 10 characters for example?? And without a dic... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
12,840 |
05-20-2010, 05:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 2 in 1
Post: RE: 2 in 1
| hey mastercracker. indeed you can expect oclhc+ soon, but currently i have no plans to add md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)). maybe when i have some spare time :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
8,718 |
01-23-2011, 06:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Incremental commamnd
Post: RE: Incremental commamnd
|
zeealpal Wrote:
--
Ahh thanks :D That makes alot more sense now. Just one thing... I have to know the password length then do i? It cannot start at a, then go up every letter/symbol atatime?? Lol pro... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
12,840 |
05-23-2010, 01:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: A third slot for Oclhashcat
Post: RE: A third slot for Oclhashcat
|
mastercracker Wrote: (05-23-2010, 05:29 PM)
--
What I am suggesting might just be too long to do or not feasible at all but if it is not too hard here's the idea. Right now, Oclhashcat has what I wo... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
15,380 |
05-23-2010, 07:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
|
xiaozhi Wrote: (05-23-2010, 12:28 PM)
--
why cannt the application work?
environment:win 7 64bit Catalyst 10.4 and ATI Stream SDK v2.1 oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970
here is a photo
xp 32bit
--
plea... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,798 |
05-23-2010, 07:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.19
Post: oclHashcat v0.19
| This is the first official update of oclHashcat.
A lot of changes have been made. Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/
* most important changes:
- New Feature: Change the kernel-... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
0 |
7,651 |
05-23-2010, 08:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| we have tested the HD5970 a lot. there are no known problems. do you have tried running other opencl applications (just to make sure your driver installations and the card are working)? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,798 |
05-25-2010, 09:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: A third slot for Oclhashcat
Post: RE: A third slot for Oclhashcat
| not yet, but i will add -e feature in a later release :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
15,380 |
05-25-2010, 09:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: md5($pass.$salt) support
Post: RE: md5($pass.$salt) support
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
14,377 |
05-25-2010, 09:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Good resume support for oclHashcat
Post: RE: Good resume support for oclHashcat
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
11,585 |
05-25-2010, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hex output of the found hashes
Post: RE: Hex output of the found hashes
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
12,537 |
05-25-2010, 09:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| oclHashcat does not cache 1st md5($pass) which is why it can handle more than 500 salts. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,025 |
05-25-2010, 01:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
Post: RE: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
| for best results, please use one of the following commands (like spoq did):
NVIDIA:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
ATI:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
41 |
128,066 |
05-25-2010, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| its working perfectly..
if you have 180M/s in single-hash and you load 340k salts then the expected speed-drop is 180.000.000 / 340.000 = 529 words/sec. thats why it shows you 0M/s but actually its... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,025 |
05-25-2010, 02:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| please try it exactly this way:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80 --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
if this does not work, same problem was reported and solved here: https://hashcat.ne... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,798 |
05-25-2010, 02:55 PM |
